Effects of vitamin D supplementation on the clinical efficacy of Crohn′s disease treated with ustekinumab: a retrospective analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20230516-00234
- VernacularTitle:补充维生素D对乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病临床疗效影响的回顾性分析
- Author:
Shunyu RAO
1
;
Dingyuan HU
;
Daopo LIN
;
Shuguang CAO
;
Hao WU
;
Yi JIANG
Author Information
1. 温州医科大学附属第二医院(育英儿童医院)消化内科，温州 325000
- Keywords:
Ustekinumab;
Vitamin D supplementation;
Crohn disease;
Clinical efficacy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestion
2023;43(11):755-763
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To retrospectively analyze the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the clinical efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) in treatment of patients with Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:Seventy-one patients with moderate to severe active CD who received the first-line treatment UST from May 2021 to February 2023 were collected by searching the clinical database of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The disease activity of CD was evaluated by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) and intestinal inflammation was assessed by simplified endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD). The CD patients were divided into supplementary group ( n=41) and non-supplementary group ( n=30) based on whether vitamin D supplementation (400 U/d) was performed during UST treatment. According to the baseline serum 25 (OH) D level, the patients were divided into vitamin D deficiency group (<20 μg/L, n=42) and non-deficiency group (≥20 μg/L, n=29). The main end points were the differences in the clinical remission (HBI score ≤4) rate and mucosal healing (SES-CD score ≤2) rate between supplementary group and non-supplementary group at week 24 of UST treatment. The secondary end points were the differences in the clinical response (the reduction of HBI score ≥3 compared to week 0) rate and biochemical remission (C-reactive protein (CRP)≤5 mg/L) rate between supplementary group and non-supplementary group at week 8 of UST treatment. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relation between serum 25(OH) D levels and the clinicopathological characteristics of CD patients. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the factors affecting the clinical efficacy of UST at week 8 and 24. Independent sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test and Fisher′s exact test were used for comparisons between the two groups. Paired t test was used to analyze the differences before and after UST treatment. Results:The results of multiple linear regression analysis for 71 CD patients showed that the baseline serum 25(OH)D level was independent influencing factor for the baseline CRP level ( β=-0.33, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.41 to -0.08, P=0.041) and baseline HBI score ( β= -0.52, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.33, P=0.027). Compared with week 0, the serum 25(OH)D level of supplementary group increased at week 8 ((17.18±5.46) μg/L vs. (13.71±7.73) μg/L), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-7.81, P<0.001), however, there was no significant difference of serum 25(OH)D in non-supplementary group ((14.85±3.92) μg/L vs. (15.69±5.48) μg/L, P>0.05). At week 8, the HBI score and median CRP level of supplementary group were both lower than those of non-supplementary group (5.71±1.88 vs. 8.34±2.27, 10.83 mg/L (3.95 mg/L, 21.07 mg/L) vs. 16.17 mg/L (6.91 mg/L, 35.48 mg/L)), and the diffierences were statistically significant ( t=0.48, Z=2.87; P<0.001 and =0.001). However, the clinical response rate and biochemical remission rate were both higher than those of non-supplementary group (68.3%, 28/41 vs. 40.00%, 12/30 and 43.9%, 18/41 vs. 13.3%, 4/30), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=5.64 and 6.21, P=0.018 and 0.013). Compared with week 0, the serum 25(OH)D level of supplementary group increased ((24.73±8.34) μg/L) at week 24, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-6.83, P<0.001), however, there was no statistically significant difference in the serum 25(OH)D level of non-supplementary group ((15.59±7.24) μg/L vs. (15.69±5.48) μg/L, P>0.05). At week 24, the decrease of HBI score and SES-CD score of supplementary group were both greater than those of non-supplementary group (difference between week 24 and week 0 -8.96±1.45 vs. -5.33±0.59, -7.00(-10.00, -3.00) vs. -2.00(-2.50, -1.50), and the differences were statisticalcy significant ( t=-5.64 and Z=-3.27, P<0.001 and =0.039). Moreover, the clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate were both higher than those of non-supplementary group (65.9%, 27/41 vs. 26.7%, 8/30, and 61.0%, 25/41 vs. 30.0%, 9/30), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=10.64 and 6.66, P=0.001 and 0.010). At week 24, the analysis of non-supplementary group indicated that the clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate of patients received vitamin D supplementary therapy were both higher than those of patients without vitamin D supplementary therapy (69.0%, 20/29 vs. 3/13, and 58.6%, 17/29 vs. 2/13), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=4.43 and 5.14, P=0.035 and 0.023). Vitamin D supplementing therapy was an independent influencing factor of clinical response rate and biochemical remission rate at week 8, clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate at week 24 for UST treatment of CD ( OR(95% CI) were 5.83(1.15 to 7.59), 4.91(3.67 to 6.98), 5.13(2.88 to 9.44), 7.01(1.16 to 20.97), respectively; P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, =0.036). Conclusion:Vitamin D supplementation may help to improve the clinical efficacy of UST treatment in CD patients, especially in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
