Clinical and endoscopic ultrasound features of IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20230609-00128
- VernacularTitle:IgG4相关自身免疫性胰腺炎临床及超声内镜特征分析
- Author:
Hongyi SUN
1
;
Ningli CHAI
;
Jinping LI
;
Huikai LI
;
Xiangyao WANG
;
Nan RU
;
Enqiang LINGHU
Author Information
1. 南开大学医学院，天津 300071
- Keywords:
Pancreatitis;
Autoimmunity;
IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis;
Clinical features;
Endoscopic ultrasound
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2024;41(2):127-130
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the differences in clinical and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings between diffuse and focal IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis (IgG4-AIP).Methods:Data of patients diagnosed as having IgG4-AIP who underwent EUS at Chinese PLA General Hospital from September 2011 to April 2022 were retrospectively collected. General clinical data, EUS features, and postoperative pathology were analyzed for characteristic differences.Results:A total of 40 patients were included in the study, 60.03±10.87 years old, a higher proportion of males (85.0%, 34/40). All patients underwent EUS, and 28 underwent EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Among the 40 patients, 29 (72.5%) had diffuse type and 11 (27.5%) had focal type. Abdominal pain [65.5% (19/29) VS 18.2% (2/11), χ2=5.393, P=0.020] and thickening of the bile duct wall [51.7% (15/29) VS 9.1% (1/11), χ2=4.394, P=0.036] were more common in the diffuse type, while main pancreatic duct dilation [45.5% (5/11) VS 10.3% (3/29), χ2=4.146, P=0.042] was more common in the focal type, with the lesion most commonly located in the pancreatic head (90.9%, 10/11). There was no significant difference in the presence of chronic pancreatitis parenchymal changes between the two groups [34.5% (10/29) VS 27.3% (3/11), χ2=0.003, P=0.955]. Conclusion:There are certain differences in abdominal pain and biliary and pancreatic duct lesions between diffuse and focal AIP. The high expression of chronic pancreatitis characteristics is not observed in either group, which provides clues for the classification of AIP in clinical practice.
