Feasibility and safety of a new portable endoscopic system for the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal trauma in animal models
10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20230227-00653
- VernacularTitle:新型便携式内镜系统用于动物腹部战创伤救治的可行性与安全性研究
- Author:
Ting ZHANG
1
;
Wenbin ZOU
;
Chunhui JIANG
;
Zhen WANG
;
Liping CAI
;
Zhaoshen LI
;
Zhuan LIAO
Author Information
1. 海军军医大学第一附属医院消化内科，上海 200433
- Keywords:
Wounds and injuries;
Portable;
Endoscopy;
Trauma;
Animal experiment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2024;41(1):25-29
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the feasibility and safety of a new portable endoscopic system and the conventional endoscopic system for the detection and emergency treatment of abdominal trauma in animal models.Methods:Three healthy Bama pigs, which were fasted and water deprivation for 8 h before surgery and then underwent induction anesthesia. A layer-by-layer incision was made into the abdominal cavity of Bama pigs. An artificial pneumoperitoneum was established using a laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum machine. A bullet model was inserted into the abdominal cavity to build the bullet wound model. After the bullet model was removed, a shrapnel model was inserted into the mid-abdomen to build the shrapnel wound model. The two types of endoscopic system were used to detect, remove bullet model or shrapnel model of the three Bama pigs respectively. The procedure order of the two systems was assigned according to the random number table method. The surgical success, operation time, endoscopy pipeline patency, endoscopic operation satisfaction, adverse events and equipment defects were recorded.Results:Three surgeries were performed using the new portable endoscopic system and three other surgeries using the conventional endoscopic system, all of which were successful. The time of the new portable endoscopic system to find and remove the bullet model, and the shrapnel model were 232.33±11.68 s, 300.33±57.70 s, 170.00±44.44 s and 52.67±2.52 s, respectively. The corresponding time of the conventional endoscopic system were 232.67±21.20 s ( t=-0.054, P=0.962), 256.67±67.00 s ( t=0.880, P=0.472), 176.00±52.42 s ( t=-0.111, P=0.922), 58.67±14.84 s ( t=-0.832, P=0.493), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two systems ( P>0.05). The endoscopy tubes of the two endoscopic systems were both smooth. The operator was satisfied with the endoscopic procedures of both endoscopic systems, and no adverse event or device defect occurred. Conclusion:The portable endoscopic system proves to be safe and feasible for the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal trauma in animal models.
