Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies
10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20230903-00182
- VernacularTitle:双胎妊娠超声指征宫颈环扎术的效果分析
- Author:
Lihua WANG
1
;
Zhenzhen YANG
;
Jun ZHANG
;
Xiufang SHAO
;
Zhi LIN
;
Mian PAN
Author Information
1. 福建省妇幼保健院（福建医科大学妇儿临床医学院）妇产科，福州 350001
- Keywords:
Pregnancy, twin;
Ultrasonography, prenatal;
Cerclage, cervical;
Cervix uteri;
Premature birth;
Pregnancy outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2023;26(10):826-832
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies.Methods:This retrospective cohort study included 96 asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervix length (CL)≤2.5 cm at 16-27 +6 weeks indicated by transvaginal ultrasound from January 2013 to May 2022 in Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital. They received either cervical cerclage (cerclage group, n=45) or conservative treatment (conservative group, n=51). The subgroup analysis was further performed after stratifying the subjects into the CL≤1.0 cm subgroup, the CL>1.0-≤1.5 cm subgroup, and the CL>1.5 cm subgroup. Two independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test were used to compare the differences in the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between different groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes of women with different CLs. Results:The average gestational age at delivery and the prolonged gestation were significantly greater in the cerclage group than those in the conservative group [35.9 (34.9-37.0) weeks vs 34.9 (29.1-36.1) weeks; 10.7 (9.6-13.1) weeks vs 8.7 (4.8-11.0) weeks, Z=－2.59 and -3.63, both P<0.05]. The incidences of preterm birth before 34 weeks and 28 weeks, chorioamnionitis, and preterm premature rupture of membrane were lower in the cerclage group than those in the conservative group [17.8% (8/45) vs 45.1% (23/51), χ2=8.16; 2.2% (1/45) vs 15.7% (8/51), Fisher' exact test; 8.9% (4/45) vs 25.5% (13/51), χ2=4.52; 15.6% (7/45) vs 33.3% (17/51), χ2=4.03; all P<0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of postpartum hemorrhage and live births between the two groups (both P>0.05). In the women with CL≤1.0 cm, the cerclage group had a greater gestational age at delivery [36.0 (34.8-37.3) weeks vs 34.9 (28.6-35.4) weeks, Z=－2.61, P=0.009], greater prolonged gestation [12.3 (9.7-13.9) weeks vs 7.3 (3.4-9.1) weeks, Z=－3.34, P=0.001], higher birthweight [2 430.0 (2 173.8-2 646.3) g vs 1 900.0 (1 372.5-2 435.0) g, Z=－3.06, P=0.002], lower incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes [16.7% (6/36) vs 36.7% (11/30), χ2=4.22, P=0.048] compared with the conservative group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that cerclage reduced the risks of preterm birth before 34 and 32 weeks [ aOR (95% CI)=0.083 (0.009-0.790) and 0.092 (0.009-0.939), both P<0.05]. However, cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth in women with CL>1.5 cm or CL>1.0-≤1.5 cm (both P>0.05). Conclusion:Ultrasound- indicated cervical cerclage can reduce the risk of preterm birth before 34 and 32 weeks, prolong pregnancy, and improve perinatal outcomes in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with CL≤1.0 cm.
