Comparison of one stitch vs two stitches for emergency cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in singleton pregnancies
10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20230816-00120
- VernacularTitle:紧急宫颈环扎术中使用单道或双道缝线预防早产的效果
- Author:
Zhimin XU
1
;
Jun ZHANG
;
Jing LIU
;
Lin ZHANG
;
Mian PAN
Author Information
1. 福建省妇幼保健院（福建医科大学妇儿临床医学院）妇产科，福州 350001
- Keywords:
Cerclage, cervical;
Premature birth;
Sutures;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2023;26(10):818-825
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effect of two vs one stitch on outcomes in women with cervical incompetence who undergo emergency transvaginal cervical cerclage.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 38 cases of cervical incompetence patients who underwent emergency cervical cerclage at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. These subjects were divided into two groups: one stitch group (loop continuous suture and knot at cervical-vaginal junction level) and two stitches group (the first loop was closed with a single suture set, and the second loop was closed below the first loop near the cervical outlet) with 19 cases in each group. Two independent samples t or t'-test, rank-sum test, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the prolongation of gestational age after emergency transvaginal cervical cerclage. Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the gestational age at cervical cerclage between the two stitches and the one stitch group [24.9 weeks (23.9-25.9 weeks) vs 23.6 weeks (22.6-24.9 weeks), Z=－1.61, P=0.108]. The average gestational age at delivery [(33.1±4.8) vs (28.6±4.3) weeks, t=－3.10] and the prolongation of gestational age after cerclage[(8.5±4.6) vs (5.0±2.6) weeks, t=－2.90] were significantly greater in the two stitches group compared to those in the one stitch group, while the rates of preterm birth before 32 weeks (6/19 vs 16/19, χ2=10.80), 34 weeks (8/19 vs 17/19, χ2=9.47), and 37 weeks (14/19 vs 19/19, Fisher's exact test) were lower (all P<0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the two stitches group had significantly higher efficacy in prolonging gestational age compared to the one stitch group [log-rank test χ2 (1)=13.10, P<0.05]. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the neonatal mortality between the two groups (2/19 vs 4/19, Fisher's exact test, P=0.660), survival neonates in the two stitches group had significantly higher birth weight [2 370.0 g (1 775.0-2 710.0 g) vs 1 300.0 g (1 210.0-1 660.0 g), Z=－3.14], lower admission rate to the neonatal intensive care unit (9/17 vs 15/15, Fisher's exact test), lower incidence of stage Ⅲ necrotizing enterocolitis (0/17 vs 5/15, Fisher's exact test), moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome (5/17 vs 10/15, χ2=4.44), and grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ intraventricular hemorrhage (0/17 vs 7/15, Fisher's exact test) compared to those in the one stitch group (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with emergency cervical cerclage with one stitch, the procedure with two stitches can prolong the gestational age and improve the neonatal prognosis more effectively.
