Bibliometric analysis of a leadership indicator system in the medical field
10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20230912-00150
- VernacularTitle:基于文献计量学的医疗领域领导力指标体系分析
- Author:
Sen YANG
1
;
Hua JIN
;
Jianwei SHI
;
Chen CHEN
;
Xuhua GE
;
Hanzhi ZHANG
;
Le MA
;
Dehua YU
Author Information
1. 同济大学附属杨浦医院全科医学科 上海市全科医学与社区卫生发展研究中心 同济大学医学院全科医学研究中心，上海 200090
- Keywords:
Leadership;
Healthcare;
Indicator construction;
Literature analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2024;23(3):244-250
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the current status of research on the construction of leadership indicator system in the medical field at home and abroad, and to analyze the characteristics of the indicator system therein.Methods:This was a bibliometric study. The group applied subject keywords to search relevant literature on the construction of leadership indicator system in the medical field at home and abroad on English websites PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Scopus and Chinese websites Baidu Academic, CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, with a time frame of 2016-2023. The basic characteristics of the literature, the theoretical framework of the research application and the research theme were extracted, and the content of the indicator system in the literature was reviewed and summarized.Results:A total of 21 literatures were included, including 7 Chinese literatures and 14 English literatures. Of these literatures, 10 focused on physician leadership, 5 on medical manager leadership, and 2 on general practitioner leadership. Among 16 research literatures, 9 informed the theoretical basis of leadership, and 4 literatures were applied research. Five main themes were identified: leadership studies of individual healthcare administrators, leadership development in healthcare, interest and attitudes of healthcare workers towards leadership learning, applications of leadership in healthcare, and the impact of leadership in healthcare on patients and healthcare organizations.Conclusions:At present, research on the construction of the leadership indicator system in the medical field presents is diverse, with differences in theoretical basis and content. The original and empirical research is still insufficient.
