Survey on the recognition of the post competency index system among Chinese rural general practice assistant physicians and analysis of influencing foctors
10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20231023-00278
- VernacularTitle:中国乡村全科执业助理医师岗位胜任力指标体系认可度调查及影响因素分析
- Author:
Han GAO
1
;
Xinyan ZHANG
;
Shasha XU
;
Xue GONG
;
Xu ZHANG
;
Yixuan LI
;
Xiaosong YU
Author Information
1. 中国医科大学附属第一医院全科医学科，沈阳 110001
- Keywords:
General practitioner;
Rural general practice assistant physician;
Index system;
Recognition level
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2024;23(1):19-24
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the recognition of the post competency index system among rural general practice assistant physicians and its influencing factors.Methods:This study was a cross-sectional survey. A questionnaire survey on the recognition of post competency index system was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021 among rural general practice assistant physicians from 10 provinces/municipalities selected by stratified cluster sampling method. The recognition of rural general practice assistant physicians at all levels of indexs and the factors influencing recognition were analyzed.Results:A total of 1 123 questionnaires were distributed and 1 024 valid ones were collected with a recovery rate of 91.18%. Of the 1 024 respondents, 529 were male(51.7%) and 435 were aged 40-49 years(42.5%), which was the highest proportion by age group. The average overall recognition score of the index system was 4.41, and the scores of the primary indexes were 4.32-4.45. Three primary indexes had the highest recognition scores: professional competence, basic health care services, and interpersonal communication and teamwork. The recognition scores on the second level index were 4.18-4.61, and the proportion of recognition scores greater than 4 was over 80%. There were significant differences in the recognition scores of the index system among assistant physicians with different working years, educational background, professional title and work unit ( F/H=6.41, 14.83, 12.45, 7.53, P<0.01). Educational background(associate degree: B=0.091, P=0.015; bachelor degree and above: B=0.196, P<0.001) and professional title(intermediate professional title and above: B=-0.234, P<0.001) were the independent factors influencing the recognition degree of the index system for rural general practice assistant physicians. Conclusions:The post competency index system is generally recognized by rural general practice assistant physician, and academic qualifications and professional title status may influence its recognition.
