A View of Korean Psychiatrists about Electroconvulsive Therapy.
- Author:
Ki Tae KIM
1
;
Doh Joon YOON
;
You Ho SHIN
;
Geon Ho BAHN
;
Tae Ho YUM
Author Information
1. Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT);
Clinical application;
Attitude
- MeSH:
Advisory Committees;
Curriculum;
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant;
Drug Therapy;
Education;
Electroconvulsive Therapy*;
Electronic Mail;
Hospitals, University;
Humans;
Inpatients;
Internet;
Internship and Residency;
Korea;
Prejudice;
Psychiatry*;
Psychotherapy;
Psychotropic Drugs;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Schizophrenia;
Suicidal Ideation
- From:Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
2001;40(6):1072-1089
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the important treatment method which has a good effect on refractory depression, schizophrenia at acute stage, patients with suicidal ideation. Although ECT results in better effects and less adverse effects in acute stage of illnesses as compared with pharmacotherapy, clinical implications are decreasing. Thus, authors surveyed a view of Korean psychiatrists about ECT to find whether there are prejudices and/or misconceptions for ECT. METHODS: Authors made survey questionaire for the attitudes of ECT, based on the APA task force 14, a clinical study in Korea, Hermann et al's report, and questioned Korean psychiatrists on their opinions for ECT through the internet E-mail, who are the members of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA) serving in hospitals with psychiatric inpatient units. RESULTS: 122 psychiatrists answered to survey questionnaire. 89.4% have positive attitude about ECT. They thought that ECT has relatively safe and potent therapeutic effects, and less adverse effects. The rate of psychiatrists who have been no experience to perform ECT was 13.9% (n=16). Interestingly all of them had been trained serve in university hospitals now. The rate of psychiatrists who had experienced practicing ECT past but, not experienced within 2 years recently was 48.7% (n=56). While psychiatrists who have been no experience of ECT were more worried about adverse effects, doctors who experienced practicing ECT thought preferably the aspect of safety and potent effects of ECT. Psychiatrists who prefer psychotherapy were more likely to concern about adverse effect of ECT, but there were no differences in other aspects when compared with others. Most psychiatrists participated in this survey had positive attitudes about application of ECT to geriatric patients, but negative at child&adolescent patients. CONCLUSION: Authors recognized that many Korean psychiatrists agreed with performing ECT, and expected good results, but in reality, it is difficult to expect for them to perform ECT. Several factors may be associated for that: the changes in trend of psychiatric treatment, production of novel psychotropic drugs, researches trends which pharmacotherapy is prevailing in the fields of psychiatry, and problems of education, that is, lack of standard educational curriculums and systemic training course at residency for ECT.
