Clinical efficacy of bipolar plasmakinetic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in day surgery mode
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20230718-00010
- VernacularTitle:日间手术模式下双极等离子腔内解剖性前列腺剜除术治疗BPH的有效性和安全性
- Author:
Keke CAI
1
;
Xiaohu ZHAO
;
Yongtao HU
;
Zhihui ZOU
;
Chaozhao LIANG
Author Information
1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科 泌尿生殖系统疾病安徽省重点实验室 安徽医科大学泌尿外科研究所，合肥 230022
- Keywords:
Prostatic hyperplasia;
Day surgery;
Bipolar plasma;
Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2023;44(11):841-846
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bipolar plasmakinetic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a day surgery mode.Methods:The clinical data of 162 BPH patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2021 to June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into day group(80 cases) and conventional group(82 cases) according to hospitalization mode. In the day group, preoperative screening and anesthesia evaluation was completed during the pre-hospitalization period, and the patient was discharged within 24 hours. The two groups were treated with BEEP, the urethral mucosa was cut at a " Ω" 5 mm proximal to the external sphincter ring in front of the verumontanum. Following the standard of anatomical enucleation of the prostate, the gland tissue was cut out after enucleation. There were no significant differences in age [(63.6±8.9) years vs. (67.5±7.1) years], body mass index [(24.3 ±2.6) kg/m 2vs. (23.0±3.2) kg/m 2], prostate volume [(55.8±16.9) ml vs. (53.7±20.7) ml], preoperative prostate-specific antigen [3.8(1.2, 5.3)ng/ml vs. 3.5(2.1, 5.6)ng/ml], the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) [(25.9±5.2) vs. (26.3±5.9)], the quality of life score (QOL) [(5.0±0.7) vs.(5.0±0.6)], the maximum urine flow rate (Q max) [(8.2±4.5) ml/s vs. (7.9±4.1) ml/s] and residual urine volume (PVR) [49(0, 131) ml vs. 45(11, 106) ml] between the two groups ( P>0.05). The waiting time before admission was [(2.6±1.2) d vs. (5.3±1.5) d], and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The perioperative efficacy indicators, total hospitalization expenses and short-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results:In this study, all patients successfully completed the operation. There were no statistical significances in the perioperative indicators between the day group and the conventional group including the operation time [(38.4±15.2) min vs. (40.4±13.9) min], enucleated tissue weight [(34.6±9.6) g vs. (35.4±10.8) g], the decrease value of hemoglobin [(13.0±2.5) g/L vs. (12.0±3.7) g/L] and the decrease value of blood sodium [(2.2±0.9) mmol/L vs. (2.4±1.3) mmol/L]( P>0.05). The significant differences were observed in bladder irrigation time [(16.9±2.1)h vs. (22.7±12.1)h], catheterization time [(18.8±5.1) h vs.(65.6±13.0)h], postoperative hospital stay [(16.8±2.4)h vs. (64.8±6.3)h] and the total hospitalization expenses [(13 282.2±2 236.3) yuan vs. (15 969.3±2 420.6) yuan] between the day group and the conventional group ( P < 0.01). In the day group, 1 case was transferred to the general ward for observation for 1 day. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications as urinary retention [6.3% (5/80) vs. 3.7% (3/82)], temporary incontinence [2.5% (2/80) vs. 2.4%(2/82)], urethra stricture [7.5% (6/80) vs. 6.1% (5/82)], and hematuria for intervention [1.3% (1/80) vs. 1.2% (1/82)]between the day group and the conventional group ( P > 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, there were no significant differences in IPSS[(6.7±2.8) vs. (6.1±2.5)], QOL[(1.8±0.9) vs. (2.0±0.8)], Q max [(26.4±5.5)ml/s vs. (25.8±4.6)ml/s] and PVR [7(2, 11)ml vs. 5(4, 8)ml] between the two groups at 6 months after operation ( P > 0.05), but there were significant improvements when compared with those items of preoperation ( P < 0.01). Conclusions:The treatment of BPH with BEEP in the day surgery mode is as safe and effective as that in the conventional surgery mode, with little bleeding, high resection efficiency, definite therapeutic effect and low incidence of complications. BEEP can shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce medical expenses in the day surgery mode, and can be carried out in hospitals with conditions.
