Efficacy of transnasal ultra-thin gastroscope-assisted ileus tube placement for the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction in the elderly
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2023.08.009
- VernacularTitle:经鼻超细胃镜辅助下肠梗阻导管置入治疗老年人粘连性肠梗阻的疗效观察
- Author:
Long FANG
1
;
Yongkang TAO
;
Shiyu DU
Author Information
1. 中日友好医院消化内科，北京 100029
- Keywords:
Intestinal obstruction;
Catheterization;
Gastroscopes
- From:
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2023;42(8):936-940
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of transnasal ultra-thin gastrointestinal endoscope-guided ileus tube insertion for the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction in the elderly.Methods:Randomized controlled trial, a total of 81 elderly patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction were enrolled, with 46 receiving transnasal ultra-thin gastroscope-assisted tube placement(observation group)and 35 receiving conventional transoral gastroscope-assisted tube placement(control group). Tube insertion was carried out.Data on the time needed for tube placement, incidents of oral or nasal bleeding, rates of successful tube placement, physical signs of symptom relief and imaging signs of symptom relief were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results:The symptom remission rate within 3 d was 93.5%(43/46)in the observation group and 88.6%(31/35)in the control group, and the rate for imaging signs of symptom remission was 82.6%(38/46)in the observation group and 74.3%(26/35)in the control group.The differences in symptom remission and imaging signs of symptom remission within 3 d were not statistically significant between the two groups( χ2=0.144, 0.830, all P>0.05). In the observation group, the time needed for tube placement was(15.4±4.2)min, which was significantly shorter than that in the control group(21.3±3.1)min( t=6.984, P<0.01). The rate of successful tube placement was 100% in both groups.In terms of adverse reactions, the observation group had 1 patient with nasal bleeding, 2 with nausea and vomiting, and 1 with a sore throat, with an overall adverse reaction rate of 8.7%(4/46), while the control group had no patient with bleeding, 18 with nausea and vomiting, and 4 with a sore throat, with an overall adverse reaction rate of 62.9%(22/35). There was no statistically significant difference in nasal bleeding(Fisher's exact probability P=0.568)or a sore throat( χ2=1.559, P=0.212), but the differences in the incidence of nausea and vomiting as well as the incidence of total adverse reactions were statistically significant( χ2=23.694, 26.752, both P<0.01)between the two groups. Conclusions:Transnasal ultra-thin gastroscope-assisted tube placement can reduce discomfort such as nausea and vomiting during tube placement, the time needed for the procedure is short with a high success rate, and therefore has very good clinical value, especially for elderly patients.
