The Nutritional Status of a Diabetes Mellitus Risk Group and a Control Group in Kangbukgu.
- Author:
Myung Hee KIM
1
;
Hyun Kyung MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Dankook University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
diabets mellitus risk group;
fasting blood sugar;
nutritional status
- MeSH:
Alanine Transaminase;
Aspartate Aminotransferases;
Blood Glucose;
Body Mass Index;
Body Weight;
Cholesterol;
Creatinine;
Diabetes Mellitus*;
Eating;
Education;
Female;
Food Habits;
Humans;
Male;
Nutritional Status*;
Obesity;
Recommended Dietary Allowances;
Seoul;
Waist-Hip Ratio
- From:Korean Journal of Community Nutrition
2002;7(2):219-231
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to collect basic data on the prevention of and education about diabetes mellitus for the nutritional management of a diabetes mellitus risk group. The study which took place in Kangbukgu, Seoul, involved a diabetes mellitus risk group (DMR > or = 110 mg/dL, 61), of males and females, aged 36 to 68 years, and a group of healthy people as a control group (< 110 mg/dL, 183), using luting blood sugar (FBS) levels. The proportion of people in the abnormal range was higher in the DMR than that of control group for total cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins-cholesterol (HDL-C), total protein, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) and creatinine. Particularly with respect to serum protein the proportion in the DMR in abnormal range (p<0.05) was significantly higher than that of the control group. The proportion in the DMR with a family history of disease was significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.01). Using body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR) and relative body weight (RBW), the obesity indices in the DMR was higher than that of the control group. Comparing the DMR and the control group with respect to dietary habits, it seems that the DMR had more undesirable dietary habits than the control group. When the intake of each nutrient for the DMR and the control group was compared to the Korean recommended dietary allowances (RDA), the proportion of excess intake and deficient intake in the DMR was higher than that of the control group. The DMR showed a greater undesirable dietary intake pattern as compared to that of the control group, based on the RDA. With respect to the dietary diversity score (DDS) and the mean adequacy ratio (MAR) for quality estimation of the overall flood intake, the DMR showed a feater undesirable pattern than the control group. According to the above results, the DMR tended to have more undesirable eating habits when compared to the control group. Therefore, to provide a more efficient nutritional education program for the DMR we must conduct lurker studies on eating habits, so as to provide systematic nutritional management based on theme differences between the DMR and the control group.
