The efficacy of infra-acetabular screw placement assisted by orthopaedic navigation robot in the treatment of acetabular fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20230331-00187
- VernacularTitle:机器人辅助置入髋臼下螺钉治疗髋臼骨折的疗效
- Author:
Peiran XUE
1
;
Siyue CHEN
;
Dong YAN
;
Junyi YUE
;
Kaifang CHEN
;
Xiaodong GUO
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院骨科，武汉 430022
- Keywords:
Artificial intelligence;
Robotics;
Acetabulum;
Fractures, bone
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2023;43(19):1285-1292
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of infra-acetabular screw placement assisted by orthopedic navigation robot in the treatment of acetabular fractures.Methods:The data of 34 patients who were treated and followed up from September 2021 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the fixation method, the patients were divided into the robot group (robot assisted placement of infra-acetabular screws) and the control group (placement of the pubis-ischium plate manually). There were 16 patients in the robot group, 7 males and 9 females, aged 57.00±6.00 years (range, 51-70 years). According to Letournel classification, there were 8 cases of both-column fractures, 4 cases of anterior column and posterior hemitransverse fractures, and 4 cases of T-shaped fractures. There were 18 cases in the control group, 8 males and 10 females, aged 54.22±8.95 years (range, 38-69 years). According to Letournel classification, there were 10 cases of both-column fractures, 6 cases of anterior column and posterior hemitransverse fractures, and 2 cases of T-shaped fractures. The intraoperative fluoroscopy times, total operation time, exposure time and screw placement (plate) time, blood loss, Matta evaluation, Majeed score, and screw placement accuracy rate (the degree of screw cutting-out was evaluated according to Lonstein criteria) were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up for 12.21±3.62 months (range, 6-17 months). In the robot group, the fluoroscopy frequency was 9.69±0.95 times (range, 8-11 times), the screw placement time was 34.32±5.28 min (range, 21-45 min), and the blood loss was 461.88±228.71 ml (range, 200-800 ml). The control group was 10.11±1.41 times (range, 7-13 times), 42.89±4.38 min (range, 36-55 min), 674.44±220.65 ml (range, 420-1,100 ml), respectively. There were significant differences in screw (plate) placement time ( t=5.18, P<0.001) and blood loss ( t=2.76, P<0.001). The accuracy of robot screw placement was 100%. According to Lonstein evaluation, there were 14 cases of grade 0 (87.5%, 14/16) and 2 cases of grade I (12.5%, 2/16). At 30 days of follow-up, all patients had good fracture ends and no internal fixation failure occurred. One week after surgery, the results of Matta evaluation in robot group were excellent in 11 cases, good in 3 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 87.5%. In the control group, 11 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, and 3 cases were poor, with an excellent and good rate of 83.3%. There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of Matta evaluation between the two groups (χ 2=0.23, P=0.892). At last follow-up, the Majeed score of robot group was 87.81±8.82 (range, 71-98), including excellent in 10 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 1 case. The score of the control group was 86.22±6.85 (range, 70-95), including 12 cases of excellent, 4 of good, and 2 of fair. There was no significant difference in Majeed score between the two groups ( t=0.59, P=0.551). No complications related to the use of robot-assisted navigation or plate fixation were observed in both groups. Conclusion:Through the navigation planning and assistance of the robot, the infra-acetabular screws can be accurately and safely placed, which avoids the shortcomings of excessive exposure and bleeding during the application of the pubis-ischium plate, the outcome was similar to that of plate treatment.
