Clinical significance of vertebral body partition in the unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20230220-00091
- VernacularTitle:"椎体分区"在指导单侧入路经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中的应用
- Author:
Depeng KOU
1
;
Hua ZHANG
;
Ruonan ZHOU
;
Jie LI
;
Xiangshan WANG
Author Information
1. 郑州市骨科医院脊柱骨科，郑州 450002
- Keywords:
Vertebroplasty;
Osteoporosis;
Spinal fractures;
Vertebral body partition
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2023;25(10):866-871
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical significance of vertebral body partition in the unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Methods:From July 2019 to October 2021, 89 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture were treated by unipedicular PVP at Department of Spinal Surgery, Zhengzhou Orthopaedic Hospital. They were 37 males and 52 females, with a mean age of (70.5±4.8) years (from 60 to 80 years). According to the vertebral body partition, the patients were divided into group a (32 cases), group b (20 cases), group c (21 cases), group d (11 cases), group e (0 case) and group f (5 cases). The therapeutic effects were evaluated by comparing the improvement rates of visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) between preoperation and postoperative 1-day among all partition groups. The imaging efficacy was evaluated by comparing the proportions of bone cement diffusion area in the posteroanterior and lateral DR films and the leakage of bone cement among all partition groups.Results:The improvement rates of VAS score between preoperation and postoperation: group a [77.8 (75.0, 82.5) %] > group b [71.4 (71.4, 71.4) %] > group c [66.7 (66.7, 66.7) %] > group d [60.0 (60.0, 62.5) %] > group f [57.1 (50.0, 57.1)%], showing a statistically significant difference between any 2 groups ( P<0.001). The improvement rates of ODI score: group a (58.0%±4.2%) > group b (47.5%±2.5%) > group c (42.9%±2.9%) > group d (39.6%±3.2%) > group f (34.2%±8.4%), showing a statistically significant difference between any 2 groups ( P<0.001). The proportions of bone cement diffusion area: group a (76.9%±3.5%) > group b (71.3%±3.1%) > group c (66.1%±3.6%) > group d (60.2%±2.6%) > group f (54.0%±4.2%), showing a statistically significant difference between any 2 groups ( P<0.001). Bone cement leakage occurred in 7 cases, including 3 ones of anterior vertebral leakage (1 case in group a and 2 cases in group b), and 4 ones of leakage into the paravertebral venous plexus (2 cases in group c and 2 cases in group d). There was no intraspinal leakage, or symptoms of nerve compression or lesion. Conclusion:In the unipedicular PVP for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, our vertebral body partition can guide puncturing for bone cement injection because it indicates the optimal and the risky partitions.
