Comparative effectiveness research of different testing methods in functional quality inspection of precision surgical instruments
10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2024.03.026
- VernacularTitle:不同测试方法在精密手术器械功能质量检查中的比较效果研究
- Author:
Fenglian CHE
1
,
2
;
Liming QIAN
;
Weiwei CHEN
;
Lele ZHENG
;
Yu CHEN
;
Huiyuan PAN
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院护理部 上海 200025
2. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院消毒供应中心 上海 200025
- Keywords:
Testing methods;
Precision surgical instruments;
Inspection;
Quality control;
Instrument test material;
Cutting performance;
Clamping performance
- From:
China Medical Equipment
2024;21(3):129-132
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the testing effects of different testing methods in the functional inspection of precision surgical scissors and needle holders.Methods:By consulting relevant literature and professional books,three testing methods and materials for precision surgical scissors and needle holders were selected.The cutting performance of the precision surgical scissors were tested by gauze cloth,cotton wool,and silicone film method in the Interlock surgical instrument testing set.The clamping performance of precision needle holder was tested by using light,needle clips,and thread clamping method in the Interlock surgical instrument testing set.100 pieces of precision surgical scissors and needle holders which were qualified for cleaning and disinfection in the hospital were selected for effectiveness testing,and a self-made satisfaction questionnaire to investigate the satisfaction of surgeons with the use of instruments.Results:After 100 precision surgical scissors tested using three methods of gauze,cotton wool,and silicone film,the qualified number of cutting performance was 94,76,and 58,respectively,the difference was statistically significant(x2=36.526,P<0.05).The satisfaction rate of surgeons with the use of precision surgical scissors passed the silicone film test was the highest at 100%,followed by cotton wool cloth at 82.0%,and the gauze method at the worst at 67.0%,the difference was statistically significant(x2=48.439,P<0.05).After 100 precision needle holders were tested by using three methods of light irradiation,needle clamping,and wire clamping,the qualified number of clamping performance was 96,78,and 62,respectively,the difference was statistically significant(x2=38.160,P<0.05).The satisfaction rate of surgeons with the precision needle holders passed the clamp line test was the highest at 100.0%,followed by the clamp needle at 79.0%,and the worst under light at 62.0%,the difference was statistically significant(x2=57.705,P<0.05).Conclusion:The function and quality of precision surgical scissors and needle holders tested by the test objects in Interlock Surgical Instrument Test Suite can objectively and accurately reflect the functional status of surgical scissors and needle holders,provide reference for regular maintenance and upkeep of instruments,and ensure safe use of instruments.
