Research on the value of quantitative evaluation system of medical equipment procurement in the management of hospital asset allocation
10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2024.02.024
- VernacularTitle:医疗设备采购量化评估体系在医院物资配置管理中的价值研究
- Author:
Yu FANG
1
;
Jian ZHAO
;
Chunsong ZHANG
;
Peng GONG
Author Information
1. 北京市顺义区医院 北京 101300
- Keywords:
Material allocation management;
Quantitative evaluation;
Analytic hierarchy process(AHP);
Expert demonstration
- From:
China Medical Equipment
2024;21(2):121-126
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To establish a quantitative evaluation system for medical equipment procurement and to explore its application value in the allocation and management of hospital assets.Methods:Based on theoretical research and on-site evaluation,an evaluation index system was developed from four levels of clinical demand,technical level,procurement process and service capabilities.The quantitative evaluation of the procurement process was conducted by using covariance-analytic hierarchy process(Cov-AHP),and a"6-stage"optimization process of medical equipment procurement was developed.A total of 257 sets of medical equipment purchased by Beijing Shunyi Hospital from August 2019 to July 2023 were selected,and the expert demonstration model(126 units)and the quantitative evaluation model(131 units)were used for medical equipment asset allocation management.The standardization of the medical equipment procurement process,effectiveness of performance objectives and satisfaction of clinical services of medical equipment procurement under different management methods were compared.Results:The standardization degrees of the procurement process of the medical equipment in the quantitative evaluation model in terms of startup,demonstration,implementation,installation and use stages were(98.42±2.83)%,(98.97±2.45)%,(96.24±3.87)%,(96.42±2.54)% and(94.82±5.31)%,respectively,which were higher than those in the expert demonstration model,the difference was statistically significant(t=3.741,4.385,6.551,7.620,4.563,P<0.05).The achievement rates of quality index,progress index,social benefit index and cost-benefit index of medical equipment procurement in the quantitative evaluation model were(96.15±4.08)%,(96.41±2.37)%,(92.77±3.89)% and(93.06±4.33)%,respectively,which were higher than those in the expert demonstration model,the difference was statistically significant(t=4.156,4.562,5.014,4.069,P<0.05).The clinical satisfaction scores of medical equipment users of medical equipment in the quantitative evaluation model for large medical equipment,life support and first aid equipment,laboratory testing equipment,surgical treatment equipment and other medical equipment were(90.24±1.89)points,(93.45±2.64)points,(95.67±3.64)points and(93.82±2.55)points and(97.25±3.89)points,respectively,which were higher than those in the expert demonstration model,the difference was statistically significant(t=3.678,4.079,2.845,3.628,5.023,P<0.05).Conclusion:The quantitative evaluation system can standardize the procurement process of medical equipment,improve the achievement rate of the performance target of medical equipment procurement,and improve the clinical service level of medical equipment.
