Construction of evaluation index system of entrustable professional activities in psychiatric residents
10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2024.03.007
- VernacularTitle:精神科住培医师置信职业行为评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Ligang ZHANG
1
;
Lingfei CHENG
;
Leilei WANG
;
Xingjie YANG
;
Jingxu CHEN
;
Huaqin CHENG
;
Ni TANG
;
Rui YANG
;
Liguo ZHOU
;
Dejun CHENG
Author Information
1. 北京回龙观医院,北京 100096
- Keywords:
psychiatric department;
standardized training of residents;
entrustable professional activities;
delphi method;
analytic hierarchy process;
evaluation index system
- From:
Chinese Mental Health Journal
2024;38(3):232-239
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct an evaluation the index system of entrustable professional activities for resident training doctors in psychiatric department,and to provide reference for formulating training strategies and assessment standards.Entrustable professional activities refers to the ability of trainees to perform and complete spe-cific clinical tasks independently after they have been trusted.Methods:Through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews,the item database of entrustable professional activities for psychiatric resident training physi-cians was established.Delphi consultation was conducted among 63 experts in the field of psychiatry from 7 national resident training bases and 3 medical colleges in China.Indicators were comprehensively screened and sorted out,and indicators at all levels and their weights were determined by the analytic hierarchy process.Results:A hierarchi-cal evaluation index system of entrustable professional activities for psychiatric resident training doctors was con-structed,including 4 first-level indicators,17 second-level indicators and 68 third-level indicators.The weights of the first-level,second-level and third-level indicators were determined.Conclusion:The evaluation index system of en-trustable professional activities is comprehensive and systematic,which is suitable for clinical work and convenient for practical application.It could provide quantitative standards for the assessment of psychiatric residents and pro-mote the improvement of training quality.
