Reported incidence of adverse reactions in plateletpheresis donors in China: a meta-analysis
10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004549x.2024.02.017
- VernacularTitle:我国单采血小板献血者献血不良反应报告发生率Meta分析
- Author:
Longqiang SHEN
1
;
Huihui FENG
1
;
Di NIU
1
;
Xia HUANG
2
,
3
Author Information
1. Ningbo Central Blood Station, Ningbo 315010, China
2. Chongqing Blood Center
3. Blood Safety Monitoring Professional Committee of Chinese Society of Blood Transfusion
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
apheresis platelets;
meta-analysis;
adverse reactions of blood donation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
2024;37(2):223-237
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
【Objective】 To analyze the overall situation and main influencing factors of adverse reactions of blood donation of apheresis platelet donors in China by systematic review, and to provide basis for preventing and controlling adverse reactions of platelet donation and improving the quality of blood donation service. 【Methods】 CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, Pubmed and Embase databases were searched to collect cross-section studies on adverse reactions of platelet donation in China. The observation period was ≥6 months, and the retrieval time was from 1998 to March 2023. The studies were independently screened by 2 evaluators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and literature quality evaluation were carried out, and meta analysis was performed by Stata 14.0 software. 【Results】 A total of 91 literature involving 585 769 apheresis platelet donors were included, and 9 102 of them had adverse reactions. Random effect model meta-analysis showed that the total incidence of adverse reactions of platelet donation was 2.65% [95% CI(2.04, 3.45), P<0.000 1]. Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of platelet donation adverse reactions in the eastern, central and western regions were 2.63% [95% CI(1.94, 3.58)], 2.32% [95% CI(1.29, 4.16)] and 4.10% [95% CI(1.90, 8.83)], respectively, with regional differences (P<0. 000 1). The incidence of adverse reactions of different degrees was 3.62% [95% CI (2.69, 4.86)] for non-severe and 0.28% [95% CI(0.18, 0.45)] for severe. The incidence of adverse reactions of blood donation was also different among different apheresis instruments (P<0. 000 1): Amicus 2.73% [95% CI(1.23, 6.06)], CS3000 series 3.59% [95% CI(2.64, 4.89)], MCS+ series 3.42% [95% CI(2.23, 5.25)], Trima 4.86% [95% CI(3.08, 7.66)], other groups 1.71% [95%CI (0.15, 20.02)]. In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions was 4.80% [95% CI(3.05, 7.55)] in females and 1.39% [95% CI(0.90, 2.15)] in males, with the incidence in females higher than that in males (P<0.000 1). The adverse reactions of platelet donors under 30 years old and over 30 years old were 2.31% [95% CI(1.34, 3.98)] and 1.95% [95% CI(1.19, 3.20)], respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.01). The incidence of adverse reactions of blood donation for first-time donors and repeat donors was 2.16% [(95%CI (1.18, 3.95)] and 1.12% [(95% CI(0.35, 3.58)], with the former higher than the latter(P<0.000 1). The incidence of adverse reactions for single and double platelet collection was 1.67% [95% CI(0.57, 4.89)] and 3.13% [95% CI(1.11, 8.86)] respectively, with no significant difference(P>0.01). 【Conclusion】 It′s suggested to unify the monitoring standards of adverse reactions of apheresis platelet donation, understand and master the factors that affect the adverse reactions of apheresis platelet donors, so as to improve the quality of apheresis platelet donation service and ensure the safety of donations.
