Effects of bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid on skin inflammation and intestinal mcroecology in acne patients with chloasma
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20230315-00200
- VernacularTitle:双歧杆菌联合水杨酸对痤疮合并黄褐斑患者皮肤炎症、肠道微生态的影响
- Author:
Junqiao WANG
1
;
Meiqin SHAO
;
Mei XU
;
Peng CHENG
Author Information
1. 温州和平整形医院美容皮肤科，温州 325000
- Keywords:
Acne vulgaris;
Gastrointestinal tract;
Enterobacteriaceae;
Salicylic acid;
Skin manifestations;
Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2023;30(9):1340-1345
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid on skin inflammation and intestinal microecology in acne patients with chloasma.Methods:Sixty acne patients with chloasma who received treatment in the Department of Cosmetic Dermatology, Wenzhou Heping Plastic Hospital from July 2020 to November 2021 were included in this study. They were randomly divided into three groups: lifestyle intervention group ( n = 20), bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention group ( n = 20), and isotretinoin intervention group ( n = 20). The lifestyle intervention group was treated by routine lifestyle care. The minocycline intervention group was administered with minocycline together with food based on lifestyle intervention. The bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention group was treated by bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid based on lifestyle intervention. Clinical efficacy, skin condition score, changes in serum Toll like receptor 2 (TLR-2) and interleukin-17 (IL-17) levels after treatment relative to those before treatment, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups. Results:The response rate in the bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention group was 95.00% (19/20), which was higher than 55.00% (11/20) in the isotretinoin intervention group and significantly higher than 20.00% (4/20) in the lifestyle intervention group ( Z = 22.94, P < 0.05). After 14 weeks of treatment, the skin condition score in the bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention group was (53.15 ± 0.23) points, which was significantly higher than (32.95 ± 0.23) points in the isotretinoin intervention group and (10.18 ± 0.25) points in the lifestyle intervention group ( F = 164 761.37, P < 0.05). Serum levels of Toll-like receptor 2 and interleukin-17 in the bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention group were (35.31 ± 5.52) pg/mL and (164.23 ± 10.12) pg/mL, respectively, which were significantly lower than (52.13 ± 5.45) pg/mL and (198.32 ± 10.23) pg/mL in the isotretinoin intervention group and (62.56 ± 6.11) pg/mL and (245.23 ± 11.31) pg/mL in the lifestyle intervention group ( F = 116.33, 296.24, both P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the bifidobacteria combined with salicylic acid intervention group was significantly lower than 65.00% (13/20) in the isotretinoin intervention group and 90.00% (18/20) in the lifestyle intervention group ( Z = 41.02, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention for the treatment of acne complicated by chloasma can greatly improve skin conditions, alleviate skin inflammation, and reduce adverse reactions. Therefore, bifidobacterium combined with salicylic acid intervention is a safe and highly efficient method for the treatment of acne complicated by chloasma and deserves clinical promotion.
