A method of antimony cerium catalytic spectrophotometric determination of water iodine using a fully automatic biochemical analyzer
10.3760/cma.j.cn231583-20221115-00375
- VernacularTitle:全自动生化分析仪锑铈催化分光光度法测定水碘的方法研究
- Author:
Shudong XU
1
;
Ruihan ZONG
;
Jian JIANG
;
Kaiqian WANG
;
Ji'an XIE
;
Gang DING
Author Information
1. 安徽省疾病预防控制中心理化检验室，合肥 230601
- Keywords:
Iodine;
Drinking;
Automatic biochemical analyzer;
Antimony cerium catalytic spectrophotometry
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2023;42(12):1004-1007
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To study the application of antimony cerium catalytic spectrophotometry using a fully automatic biochemical analyzer (hereinafter referred to as this method) in the determination of water iodine.Methods:Based on the principle of antimony cerium reoxidation reduction reaction catalyzed by iodine, the iodine content in water was determined in the range of 0 - 100 μg/L iodine mass concentration. The detection limit, precision and accuracy (determination of standard substances GBW09113j and GBW09114j for iodine composition analysis in water and the experiment of standard recovery) of this method were verified. This method was compared with the arsenic and cerium catalytic spectrophotometry recommended by the National Reference Laboratory for Iodine Deficiency Disorders.Results:Within the range of 0 - 100 μg/L iodine mass concentration, the qualitative and quantitative detection limits of this method were 0.81 and 2.70 μg/L, respectively (sampling quantity was 35 μl). In the precision experiment, the relative standard deviation of water samples with different iodine mass concentrations ranged from 1.2% to 4.0%. The determination results of the standard substances GBW09113j and GBW09114j for iodine composition analysis in water were both within the given standard value range. The standard recovery rates of water samples with low, medium and high iodine mass concentrations ranged from 101.0% to 106.0%, and the total average standard recovery rate was 103.2%. The results of the method comparison experiment showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the results of water iodine determination between the two methods ( t = - 0.78, P = 0.779). Conclusion:This method has a low detection limit, high precision and good accuracy, making it suitable for the detection of large quantities of samples in the monitoring of iodine deficiency disorders.
