Analysis of medical ethics review results in the Chinese Journal of Epidemiology from 2017 to 2020
10.3760/cma.j.cn231583-20221214-00403
- VernacularTitle:2017 - 2020年《中华地方病学杂志》中的医学伦理审查结果分析
- Author:
Shifei WU
1
;
Ying LI
;
Jing ZHOU
;
Yiyi ZHANG
;
Yang LIU
;
Xinying MA
;
Miao HE
Author Information
1. 哈尔滨医科大学中国疾病预防控制中心地方病控制中心中华地方病学杂志编辑部，哈尔滨 150081
- Keywords:
Medical ethics;
Review;
Epidemiology;
Analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2023;42(10):852-856
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To learn about the application of medical ethics review in scientific research and prevention of endemic diseases.Methods:The method of retrospective analysis was used, original articles on field epidemiological investigation and clinical medicines published by Chinese Journal of Epidemiology from 2017 to 2020 were collected. Examination of medical ethics in national, provincial and municipal fund programs and nonfund projects was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochran-Armitage trend test and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.Results:A total of 638 articles were collected from 2017 - 2020, with 36 excluded and 602 remaining. The proportion of papers published after medical ethics review over the past four years was 56.85% (83/146), 62.50% (105/168), 59.87% (94/157), and 60.31% (79/131), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in trend testing ( Z = 0.41, P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of papers produced by academic works, on-site investigations, and clinical medicine programs among different years (χ 2 = 0.01, 1.31, 1.92, P > 0.05). The proportion of papers published that supported by various fund programs that had undergone medical ethics review over the past four years was 60.55% (66/109), 62.28%(71/114), 62.38% (63/101), and 60.22% (56/93), respectively. The trend test showed no statistically significant difference( Z = - 0.03, P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of papers published that supported by national level projects, provincial and ministerial level projects, and municipal level projects among different years (χ 2 = 0.06, 0.02, 0.19, P > 0.05). The difference in the trend test of the output papers of research projects approved by the higher-level ethics committee and marked with approval numbers over the past 4 years was statistically significant ( Z = 2.85, P < 0.01); the difference was statistically significant when compared across years (χ 2 = 8.13, P < 0.01); the proportion of papers increased from 8.22% (12/146) in 2017 to 18.08% (25/131) in 2020 (χ 2 = 7.04, P = 0.008). There was no statistically significant difference ( Z = - 0.53, P > 0.05) in the proportion of papers that expressed their consent in terms of informed consent over the past 4 years; There was no statistically significant difference in comparison between different years (χ 2 = 0.28, P > 0.05). Conclusions:Medical ethics review has been taken seriously by the majority of researchers and is widely used in endemic scientific research and prevention projects.
