Vocational training for pediatric clinical research coordinators: current status and demand analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231025-01646
- VernacularTitle:儿科临床研究协调员职业培训现状的调查与需求分析
- Author:
Wenxiang FAN
1
;
Ji LI
;
Rui WANG
;
Chunmei LI
;
Waner ZHENG
;
Chi XU
;
Shaoqing NI
Author Information
1. 浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院临床试验机构管理办公室，国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心，杭州 310052
- Keywords:
Pediatrics;
Clinical research coordinator;
Training;
Need;
Base
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2024;23(3):327-332
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the current status of vocational training for pediatric clinical research coordinators (CRC), and discuss the construction of base-based pediatric CRC training, and to promote the ability of pediatric CRCs.Methods:From July 25 to October 16, 2023, an anonymous self-designed questionnaire survey was conducted through the Wenjuanxing platform to investigate the current situation of pediatric CRC vocational training and base training needs. The data were collated using Excel. Categorical data were described as numbers and percentages.Results:A total of 328 usable questionnaires were returned. Only 7.62% (25 people) believed that existing CRC training was sufficient and could meet actual work needs; 4.88% (16 people) responded that there was no training; 46.34% (152 people) believed that the training was insufficient to support actual work needs; 87.50% (287 people) believed that continuous CRC training was needed; 46.95% (154 people) preferred experienced CRCs for teaching, who should have at least 3 years of CRC work experience; and 46.95% (154 people) preferred a duration of 3 months for CRC training. The preferred training methods were: practice under the direction of experienced CRCs (90.85%, 298 people), step-by-step teaching of practical skills (88.41%, 290 people), case analysis and discussion (87.20%, 286 people), process simulation (83.23%, 273 people), and lecture-based teaching (76.52%, 251 people). The preferred post-training assessment methods were: case analysis (76.52%, 251 people), operation simulation (74.09%, 243 people), process simulation (73.17%, 240 people), written examination (66.16%, 217 people), and interview (63.72%, 209 people).Conclusions:The current pediatric CRC training is not enough to meet actual work needs. It is urgent to develop and promote a CRC training system that can meet work needs, laying the foundation for the construction of pediatric clinical research ecology in China.
