Difference in the postgraduate education model of clinical laboratory diagnostics between China and Australia: With Griffith University as an example
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220922-01602
- VernacularTitle:中澳临床检验诊断学研究生教育模式差异及启示：以格里菲斯大学为例
- Author:
Wei LIU
1
;
Yurong FU
;
Zhengjun YI
Author Information
1. 山东第二医科大学医学检验学院，潍坊 261053
- Keywords:
Australia;
Clinical laboratory diagnostics;
Postgraduate education
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2024;23(2):285-288
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Laboratory medicine is an important subject of auxiliary clinical diagnosis, and the postgraduate education of clinical laboratory diagnostics is the key to cultivating high-end laboratory talents. This study analyses the differences in the postgraduate education model of clinical laboratory diagnostics between China and Australia from the four aspects of academic degree system, curriculum setting, teaching methods, and autonomous learning ability training and discusses the postgraduate education reform of laboratory medicine in China. With reference to the advanced experience of countries with a well-developed education system, the education reform in China can improve the comprehensive quality of postgraduate student in laboratory medicine and enhance the medical level of China.
