Application of laparoscopic simulated uterine model in gynecological resident training
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230707-01510
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜仿真子宫模型在妇科住院医师培训中的应用
- Author:
Guangxiao LI
1
;
Yunshan ZHU
;
Xiaona HUANG
;
Songying ZHANG
Author Information
1. 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院妇产科/浙江省生殖障碍诊治研究重点实验室/浙江省妇产疾病临床医学研究中心，杭州 310016
- Keywords:
Laparoscopic simulated uterine model;
Resident training;
Laparoscopic surgery;
Department of gynecology
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2024;23(1):140-144
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the training effect between the laparoscopic simulated uterine model (LSUM) with multi-angle suture and the traditional surgical model and to identify a laparoscopic model more suitable for gynecological resident training.Methods:Forty-eight residents who were trained in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine from February 2021 to February 2023 were selected. They were trained in batches, with each batch randomly divided into two groups of the same size. The observation group was trained with the traditional surgical model and general surgical videos, while the experimental group was trained with a self-developed LSUM with multi-angle suture and corresponding surgical videos. Finally, the two groups were compared for the assessment results, and a questionnaire survey was conducted in the experimental group. The statistical software SPSS 20.0 was used for t-test or chi-square test of the results. Results:There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender distribution, education level, and clinical experience. In theoretical assessment results, no significant difference was shown between the experimental group and the observation group [(82.63±3.93) vs. (85.00±6.15), P>0.05]. In skill assessment results, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the anterior wall assessment [(83.08±4.47) vs. (82.79±3.58), P=0.804]. However, in the assessment of the lateral and posterior walls, the proficiency, accuracy, and degree of coordination between two hands of the experimental group were better than those of the observation group, with the total score being significantly different [(64.13±3.34) vs. (46.75±3.50), (62.25±4.41) vs. (45.00±2.89), P<0.001]. In the questionnaire survey, the experimental group had a high degree of satisfaction with the LSUM and thought that the highly simulated model was beneficial to their training. Conclusions:Compared with the traditional surgical model, the LSUM with multi-angle suture can effectively improve the operation level of residents, which provides a new idea for the laparoscopic simulation training of gynecological residents in the future.
