Research on evaluation of comprehensive ability and influencing factors of graduates in clinical medicine
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210407-01545
- VernacularTitle:临床医学专业毕业生综合能力评价及影响因素研究
- Author:
Yonghong MA
1
;
Jiao TAN
;
Ke MEN
;
Hairui ZHANG
;
Yancheng FENG
Author Information
1. 西安医学院公共卫生学院/陕西省公共安全医学防控研究中心，西安 710021
- Keywords:
Clinical medicine graduates;
Comprehensive ability;
Education evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2023;22(12):1906-1911
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the comprehensive ability and influencing factors of clinical medicine graduates from a medical college in Xi'an, and provide a scientific basis for improving the training model and comprehensive ability of clinical medicine students.Methods:Based on the Chinese Undergraduate Medical Education Standard-Clinical Medicine Specialty (2016 Edition), we conducted a self-designed questionnaire, the Clinical Medicine Graduate Comprehensive Ability Evaluation Questionnaire, containing 62 items in 4 dimensions, selected the clinical medicine graduates as the research objects by random sampling method, used SPSS 22.0 to make data analysis, and performed multiple linear regression to analyze its influencing factors.Results:Clinical medicine graduates had the highest score in the field of clinical competence (3.05±0.84), followed by the field of professionalism (2.48±0.81), and the lowest score was in the field of science and academics (1.89±0.68). The top three scores of each factor were clinical practice ability (3.39±0.76), theoretical knowledge mastery (3.55±0.48) and medical knowledge mastery (2.98±0.81). The three factors with the lowest scores were literature search ability (1.31±0.64), global health issues (1.49±0.82) and self-improvement willingness and ability (1.81±0.73). Using the multiple stepwise regression method to analyze the influencing factors of comprehensive ability, the optimal equation was obtained: Y=8.412+0.063 X6+0.190 X8+0.266 X10+0.031 X11+0.187 X12 ( X6, working level; X8, academic performance ranking; X10, practical teaching satisfaction; X11, mode of teaching satisfaction; X12, Re-education satisfaction after graduation). Among them, the higher the practical teaching satisfaction, the satisfaction of re-education and the satisfaction of teaching mode after graduation, the higher the student's performance ranking, and the higher the comprehensive ability score of clinical graduates. Graduates whose employment level was in a general hospitals had higher comprehensive ability scores than those of grassroots hospitals such as community/township hospitals. Conclusions:In the process of training clinical medicine students, we should improve the quality of practical teaching and the teaching model, increase the training of science and academic fields, increase the investment in re-education of primary medical institutions, and raise the satisfaction of graduates in education, so as to improve the clinical medicine profession comprehensive ability of graduates.
