Analysis of medical disputes related to drug-induced cross-allergy and study on prescripition review strategy
10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202306062
- VernacularTitle:药源性交叉过敏医疗纠纷分析及其处方审核策略研究
- Author:
Wei LI
1
;
Chengliang ZHANG
;
Pinpin XUE
;
Jinfeng DU
;
Dong LIU
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院药学部(武汉 430030)
- Keywords:
Cross-allergy;
Medical disputes;
Tort liability;
Prescription review;
Adverse drug reactions
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
2024;33(1):2-8
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the rules and characteristics of cross-allergy cases related to drug-related medical disputes,and to provide reference for the formulation of cross-allergy prescription review strategy.Methods The judgments of cross-allergy related medical damage liability disputes recorded in the legal document database of Beijing Yingke Law Firm and the Chinese Judgment Document Network database from August 2010 to June 2023 were analyzed,the causes of relevant disputes were summarized and analyzed,and more comprehensive response measures were formulated.Results A total of 65 judgments were retrieved,and seven judgments were included.The main drugs causing cross allergy were antibiotics(penicillins,cephalosporins and sulfonamides).Seven cases of medical disputes,all of which were ruled by the court that the medical party had medical errors due to cross-allergies,and had to bear 30％to 80％of the compensation liability.The main reasons for the punishment were that the doctor did not pay enough attention to the patient's past history of allergy and chose unreasonable drugs.Conclusion Medical institutions can reduce the risk of cross-allergy by means of information technology,and play the role of pharmacists in prescription review and pharmaceutical care.Physicians should pay attention to the patient's past history,earnly inquire,strengthen medication education and monitoring,reduce the threat of adverse reactions to the patient's life safety and related drug disputes,and protect the legitimate rights and interests of both doctors and patients.
