The role of C-reactive protein to prealbumin ratio for diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20230310-00239
- VernacularTitle:C反应蛋白与前白蛋白比值在脓毒症诊断和预后评估中的应用价值
- Author:
Yun ZHAO
1
;
Lei ZHANG
;
Xiaochen MA
;
Xiaotian WANG
Author Information
1. 东营市人民医院医院感染管理科，东营 257091
- Keywords:
C-reactive protein;
Prealbumin;
Sepsis;
Diagnosis;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2024;47(2):123-128
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application of C-reactive protein(CRP) to prealbumin (PA) ratio(CRP/PA) for diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis.Methods:By a retrospective study, a total of 95 sepsis patients (sepsis group) and 100 local infection patients(non-sepsis group) treated in Dongying People′s Hospital from September 2021 to September 2022 were enrolled. Sepsis patients were divided into survival group(57 cases) and death group (38 cases) according to the 28-day outcome. The clinical data were collected and CRP/PA was calculated. Multivariate Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to analyze the relationship between various indicators and the occurrence and prognosis of sepsis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of CRP/PA for sepsis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of different CRP/PA ratios for patients with sepsis.Results:The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, prealbumin were lower and heart rate, respiratory rate, CRP, CRP/PA, procalcitonin were higher in the sepsis group compared to the non-sepsis group: (117.27 ± 11.65) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) vs. (123.26 ± 10.71) mmHg, (69.42 ± 8.58) mmHg vs. (75.44 ± 6.53) mmHg, (174.09 ± 24.77) g/L vs. (207.13 ± 34.31) g/L, (97.87 ± 12.73) bpm vs. (86.90 ± 10.19) bpm, 22.0(20.00, 25.00) times/min vs. 21.00(19.00, 23.00) times/min, (93.96 ± 19.64) mg/L vs. (77.56 ± 22.54) mg/L, 0.54(0.44, 0.65) vs. 0.37(0.28, 0.46), 3.35(2.16, 4.17) μg/L vs. 1.52(0.81, 2.16) μg/L, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that CRP/PA and procalcitonin were risk factors for sepsis ( P<0.05). The results of ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of CRP/PA in diagnosis of sepsis was 0.821, the specificity and sensitivity was 76.0% and 93.7%, respectively. The diastolic blood pressure, prealbumin, neutrophil were higher and the heart rate, respiratory rate, CRP, CRP/PA, lymphocytes, procalcitonin were lower in the survival group compared to the death group: (71.76 ± 8.86) mmHg vs. (67.86 ± 8.10) mmHg, (181.46 ± 24.35) g/L vs. (163.05 ± 21.28) g/L, (63.46 ± 9.88) × 10 9/L vs.(57.13 ± 8.64) × 10 9/L, (95.68 ± 13.48) times/min vs. (101.16 ± 10.88) times/min, 22.00(19.50, 24.00) times/min vs. 24.00(20.00, 28.00) times/min, (88.09 ± 19.35) mg/L vs. (102.76 ± 16.75) mg/L, 0.46(0.41, 0.58) vs. 0.63(0.55, 0.72), 21.00(16.00, 30.00) ×10 9/L vs. 29.50(18.00, 37.30) ×10 9/L, 2.94(2.10, 3.97) μg/L vs. 3.82(2.21, 4.77) μg/L, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CRP/PA and procalcitonin were independent risk factors for the prognosis of sepsis ( P<0.05). The AUC of CRP/PA in predicting the prognosis of sepsis was 0.827, the specificity and sensitivity was 92.1% and 63.8%, respectively. Grouped by the cut-off of CRP/PA (0.48), the 28-day mortality rate of patients in the CRP/PA>0.48 was significantly higher than that of patients in the CRP/PA≤0.48, there was statistical difference ( P<0.01). Conclusions:CRP/PA ratio can be used as an index for diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis.
