Clinical study on different doses of paricalcitol combined with cinacalcet in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with maintenance hemodialysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20230308-00228
- VernacularTitle:不同剂量帕立骨化醇联合西那卡塞治疗维持性血液透析患者继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的临床研究
- Author:
Yu XUE
1
;
Li WEI
;
Tingting WANG
;
Yawei LI
;
Cuiping LIU
Author Information
1. 北京老年医院肾内科，北京 100095
- Keywords:
Hyperparathyroidism, secondary;
Renal dialysis;
Paricalcitol;
Cinacalcet
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2023;46(11):983-989
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical value of different doses of paricalcitol combined with cinacalcet in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).Methods:The clinical data of 90 patients with MHD combined with SHPT from December 2020 to December 2022 in Beijing Geriatric Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 patients were treated with cinacalcet (control group), 30 patients were treated with fixed dose paricalcitol combined with cinacalcet (experimental group A), and 30 patients were treated with adjusting dose of paricalcitol based on the level of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) combined with cinacalcet (experimental group B). All patients were continuously treated for 8 weeks. The blood calcium, blood phosphorus, iPTH, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, type Ⅰ collagen carboxy terminal peptide cross-linking (β-CTX), N-terminal medium molecule fragment of calcium (N-MID), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and Klotho protein before treatment and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment were detected; coronary artery calcification (CAC) score and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) score were evaluated. The adverse reactions were recorded.Results:There were no statistical differences in the indexes before treatment among three groups ( P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in blood calcium and blood phosphorus after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment among three groups ( P>0.05). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the iPTH, β-CTX, osteoprotegerin, N-MID, osteocalcin and FGF-23 in experimental group A and experimental group B were significantly lower than those in control group, after 4 weeks of treatment: (936.99 ± 202.36) and (635.74 ± 135.44) ng/L vs. (1 028.56 ± 11.39) ng/L, (1.85 ± 0.32) and (1.50 ± 0.27) μg/L vs. (2.27 ± 0.69) μg/L, (71.18 ± 6.98) and (64.33 ± 7.87) ng/L vs. (80.15 ± 10.85) ng/L, (106.36 ± 14.42) and (92.64 ± 11.32) μg/L vs. (135.19 ± 15.18) μg/L, (66.17 ± 8.52) and (60.21 ± 7.85) μg/L vs. (73.15 ± 9.44) μg/L, (109.17 ± 11.24) and (98.50 ± 10.36) ng/L vs. (126.18 ± 15.64) ng/L; after 8 weeks of treatment: (632.17 ± 154.98) and (526.85 ± 98.45) ng/L vs. (819.85 ± 169.78) ng/L, (1.33 ± 0.15) and (1.15 ± 0.20) μg/L vs. (1.78 ± 0.27) μg/L, (65.78 ± 9.74) and (52.77 ± 7.18) ng/L vs. (74.26 ± 11.58) ng/L, (85.64 ± 11.62) and (70.25 ± 8.59) μg/L vs. (105.92 ± 19.17) μg/L, (48.17 ± 5.99) and (41.15 ± 6.44) μg/L vs. (59.24 ± 6.87) μg/L, (90.15 ± 11.25) and (82.58 ± 9.74) ng/L vs. (105.26 ± 14.35) ng/L, the indexes in experimental group B were significantly lower than those in experimental group A, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the Klotho protein in experimental group A and experimental group B was significantly higher than that in control group, after 4 weeks of treatment: (124.25 ± 14.85) and (146.31 ± 16.85) U/L vs. (107.26 ± 11.36) U/L, after 8 weeks of treatment: (135.62 ± 16.87) and (150.24 ± 17.43) U/L vs. (115.56 ± 15.48) U/L, the Klotho protein in experimental group B was significantly higher than that in experimental group A, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the CAC score and AAC score in experimental group A and experimental group B were significantly lower than those in control group, the indexes in experimental group B were significantly lower than those in experimental group A, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with the fixed dose of paricalcitol combined with cinacalcet therapy, the adjusting the dosage of paricalcitol combined with cinacalcet therapy based on iPTH level has more definite therapeutic effects in patients with MHD combined with SHPT, which can improve bone metabolism and reduce vascular calcification.
