Comparison of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block and continuous adductor canal nerve block in total hip arthroplasty
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20230210-00104
- VernacularTitle:超声引导下腰丛神经阻滞与连续收肌管阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的应用比较
- Author:
Faxing WANG
1
;
Yini WU
;
Xin HAN
;
Hong DAI
;
Zhonghua LI
;
Jimin WU
Author Information
1. 丽水市人民医院麻醉科，丽水 323000
- Keywords:
Hip joint;
Echocardiography;
Arthroplasty;
Lumbar plexus block;
Adductor canal nerve block
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2023;46(9):785-790
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the application value of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB) and continuous adductor canal nerve block (ACNB) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to explore the anesthesia scheme of THA.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled trial was used. Ninety patients who received THA admitted to in Lishui People′s Hospital from March 2019 to February 2022 were selected as the study subjects. According to the random number table method, 90 patients were divided into the test group and the control group, with 45 patients in each. The control group received LPB + general anesthesia, and the test group received ACNB + general anesthesia. By evaluating the hemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the time of entry (T 1), osteotomy (T 2), prosthesis implantation (T 3) and immediately after surgery (T 4); the pain degree visual analogue score (VAS) at 6 h (S 1), 12 h (S 2), 24 h (S 3), 48 h (S 4) after awakening; the dosage of anesthetic drugs, the anesthetic effects of LPB and ACNB in THA were compared. Results:From T 2 to T 4, HR of patients in the two groups had a trend of increase: (85.24 ± 4.26) times/min vs. (86.13 ± 4.86) times/min, (83.82 ± 5.11) times/min vs. (85.16 ± 3.56) times/min and (81.64 ± 4.32) times/min vs. (82.24 ± 4.62) times/min, while MAP was in a downward trend: (86.54 ± 4.25) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) vs. (85.35 ± 4.66) mmHg, (86.15 ± 3.92) mmHg vs. (84.86 ± 4.13) mmHg and (90.65 ± 5.25) mmHg vs. (92.12 ± 4.62) mmHg. The difference at different time points was statistically significant ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in HR, MAP and change trend between the two groups at different time ( P>0.05). The VAS score of the two groups increased from S 2 time point, and the difference between different time points was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The rising trend of VAS score in the test group was lower than that in the control group, and the VAS score at different time points was lower than that in the control group ( P<0.05). The dosage of sufentanil used in the test group was less than that in the control group: (114.37 ± 16.61) μg vs. (131.36 ± 18.31) μg, and the number of press of analgesia pump was less than that in the control group: 6.00 (5.00, 6.50) times vs. 8.00 (7.00, 9.00) times ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Ultrasound-guided LPB and ACNB could maintain hemodynamic stability in THA. Especially, ACNB could play an analgesic role within 48 h after THA and reduce the dosage of analgesic drugs.
