- VernacularTitle:髋膝关节置换后假体周围感染的治疗
- Author:
Zijun ZENG
1
;
Wei HE
;
Qiushi WEI
;
Mincong HE
Author Information
- Keywords: joint replacement; periprosthetic infection; operation; biotherapy; Chinese medicine
- From: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2024;28(12):1937-1943
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: BACKGROUND:Periprosthetic joint infection is one of the most unwanted complications for surgeons and patients after arthroplasty,and its recalcitrance and intractability have always been a headache for arthroplasty surgeons. OBJECTIVE:To review the latest domestic and international clinical treatments used in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty in recent years,including antibiotic treatment,surgical treatment,biological treatment and Chinese medicine treatment,to promote the research progress in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection in China. METHODS:The literature from January 2000 to October 2022 on CNKI,WanFang,VIP,and PubMed was retrieved by the first author.762 articles were obtained by reading the titles for initial screening,then 194 articles were obtained by reading the abstracts and excluding studies with duplicate contents,low data reliability,and outdated views.Finally,88 articles were included through intensive reading of the original text. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Combined antibiotic regimens may help eradicate the infection in the treatment of periprosthetic infections.(2)Two-stage revision remained the golden indicator for the treatment of periprosthetic infection.(3)One-stage revision lacked large-sample clinical studies and required more clinical observation.(4)Phage therapy and newer drug delivery systems in biological therapy had been applied in small amounts in the clinic,showing their advantages in the prevention and eradication of periprosthetic infections.(5)Chinese medicine with antibiotics and surgical treatment methods can improve the prevention and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection,but high-level evidence-based medical evidence was lacking.