Application of Press-Z-track-Turn intramuscular injection in the injection of Fluvastatin
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20221222-03878
- VernacularTitle:按压-Z型-转动肌内注射法在氟维司群注射中的应用研究
- Author:
Yang WANG
1
;
Mengqi LI
;
Yingming SUN
;
Li GAO
;
Sumei GUO
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学肿瘤医院日间病房 国家恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心 天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室 天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心，天津 300060
- Keywords:
Injections, intramuscular;
Fluvastatin;
Acupoint pressing;
Z trajectory injection
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2023;39(34):2669-2674
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application effect of Press-Z-track-Turn (PZT) intramuscular injection on the extravasation, local reaction, local pain after injection and patient satisfaction after Fulvestrant injection.Methods:Used a self-controlled study, 63 patients who underwent bilateral intramuscular injection of Fluvastatin in the outpatient injection room of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from August to October 2022 were conveniently selected. The observation time was two treatment cycles after inclusion in this study. Before the injection of the first treatment cycle, a coin toss was used to randomly decide to use traditional intramuscular injection and PZT intramuscular injection method for injection and record. After 28 days, another injection method was used, with a total of 126 injections per injection method. Observed the extravasation of drug solution and local reactions at the injection site within 7 days after injection using two injection methods, as well as the pain and satisfaction of patients within 7 days after injection.Results:The extravasation rate of drug solution for the PZT intramuscular injection was 1.59% (2/126), which was lower than 7.14% (9/126) for the traditional intramuscular injection, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.66, P<0.05); the incidence of mild and moderate local reactions for the PZT intramuscular injection was 3.97% (5/126) and 1.59% (2/126), respectively, lower than that for the traditional intramuscular injection 11.11% (14/126) and 5.56% (7/126), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=8.26, P<0.05); the pain score of the PZT intramuscular injection was (2.08 ± 0.85) points, lower than that of the traditional intramuscular injection (5.03 ± 1.06) points, and the satisfaction score of the PZT intramuscular injection was (23.68 ± 1.64) points, higher than that of the traditional intramuscular injection (20.10 ± 2.58) points. The difference was statistically significant ( t=-17.24, 9.16, both P<0.01). Conclusions:PZT intramuscular injection can effectively reduce the overflow rate, the incidence of grade 1 and 2 local reactions and the degree of pain of patients, and improve patient satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical application.
