Effects of somatosensory interactive games on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20230124-00177
- VernacularTitle:体感互动游戏对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者康复疗效的Meta分析
- Author:
Yushan SHEN
1
;
Mengling CHEN
;
Houqiang HUANG
;
Longyu XIONG
;
Silin ZHENG
Author Information
1. 西南医科大学护理学院，泸州 646000
- Keywords:
Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive;
Meta-analysis as topic;
Somatic interactive games;
System evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2023;39(31):2473-2481
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To systematically evaluate the application effect of somatosensory interactive games in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in order to provide a basis for clinical application.Methods:Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies on the application of somatosensory interactive games in patients with COPD were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang, China Knowledge Network and VIP. The retrieval time limit is from the establishment of the database to October 2022. RevMan5.2 software was used for Meta analysis.Results:Ten articles involving 611 patients were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that the somatosensory interactive game group was superior to the conventional training group in improving FEV 1/FVC% ( WMD=6.83, 95% CI 3.71-9.95, Z=4.29, P<0.01), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) ( WMD=13.36, 95% CI 0.50-26.23, Z=2.04, P<0.05), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( WMD=-1.64, 95% CI -2.31--0.97, Z=4.78, P<0.01), COPD Assessment Test score ( WMD=-2.95, 95%CI -4.08--1.82, Z=5.13, P<0.01) in COPD patients. However, there was no significant difference in FEV1 % ( WMD=2.91, 95% CI -1.61-7.43, P=0.210) and dyspnea ( SMD=0.63,95% CI -0.24-1.49, P=0.150) between the two groups. Conclusions:Compared with conventional training, somatosensory interactive game training can effectively improve lung function and quality of life in patients with COPD, relieve anxiety and depression. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included literature, the reliability of the conclusions still needs to be verified by more high-quality studies.
