Reliability and validity of two tools for the measurement of the severity of nausea in Chinese children with malignant neoplasms
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20230412-00878
- VernacularTitle:两种恶心评估工具在中国恶性肿瘤患儿中应用的信效度检验
- Author:
Meiling LIU
1
;
Jun DENG
;
Longzhen LIU
;
Wanqi YU
;
Yuyun YANG
;
Hui HUANG
;
Qiuchan LIU
;
Liuhong WU
;
Ruiqing CAI
Author Information
1. 中山大学肿瘤防治中心儿童肿瘤科 华南恶性肿瘤防治全国重点实验室，广州 510060
- Keywords:
Neoplasms;
Pediatric nursing;
Nausea;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2023;39(29):2270-2276
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To introduce and validate the Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT) and the Baxter Retching Faces Scale (BARF) in the assessment of chemotherapy induced nausea in Chinese children with malignant neoplasms, and to explore the cut-off value for rescue antiemetic.Methods:A prospective descriptive study was conducted, 244 children in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center with malignant neoplasms who received chemotherapy were selected by convenience sampling from July to August 2021. PeNAT, BARF, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised(FPS-R) were used to assess the severity of nausea and pain before and after chemotherapy, before and 30-60 minutes after the use of rescue antiemetic or analgesic. After chemotherapy, the children also were asked the changes of nausea severity and whether antiemetic was needed.Results:A test-retest reliability was conducted on the patients with the same severity of nausea before and after chemotherapy, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the PeNAT and BARF were 0.940 (both P<0.05). After chemotherapy, the PeNAT and BARF were 1.5(1.0, 2.0) and 2.0(0, 2.0) points, which were significantly higher than the 1.0(1.0, 1.0) and 0(0, 0) points before chemotherapy ( Z = - 9.19, - 9.09, both P<0.01). The PeNAT and BARF of 11 cases receiving antiemetic before medication were 4.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 3.0(2.0, 4.0) points, which were higher than the 0(0, 2.0) and 1.0(1.0, 2.0) points without antiemetic ( Z = - 4.03, - 3.86, both P<0.05). After chemotherapy, the correlation coefficients between PeNAT or BARF and VAS-nausea were r = 0.933, 0.957 (both P<0.01), and FPS-R were r = 0.192, 0.189 (both P<0.05). After using antiemetic, PeNAT and BARF were 2.0(2.0, 3.0) and 2.5(2.0, 4.0) points, which were significant different than the 3.0(3.0, 3.8) and 4.0(4.0, 8.0) points before using antiemetic ( Z = - 2.97, - 2.83, both P<0.05). According ROC curves and cut-off values, it was determined that PeNAT≥3 and BARF≥4 had clinical significance and require clinical intervention. Conclusions:PeNAT and BARF have excellent reliability and validity in the assessment of chemotherapy induced nausea in children with malignant neoplasms, they can effectively identify the requirement of rescue antiemetic, and evaluate the efficacy of antiemetic.
