The application value of respiratory intervention training in feeding of preterm infants
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20221018-03214
- VernacularTitle:呼吸干预训练在早产儿喂养中的应用价值
- Author:
Keke DONG
1
;
Shengqiang ZOU
;
Jing ZHANG
;
Qing YANG
;
Xiangyu GAO
;
Shan WANG
Author Information
1. 江苏大学附属镇江三院重症医学科，镇江 212009
- Keywords:
Nursing care;
Preterm infants;
Respiratory intervention;
Mouth movement;
Feeding
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2023;39(27):2090-2096
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of respiratory intervention training in feeding of preterm infants, so as to provide reference for feeding interventions in preterm infants.Methods:From March 2021 to October 2021, the 80 preterm infants hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Xuzhou Central Hospital were selected and divided into intervention group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases) according to the random table method in a prospective study. The common nursing was given in the control group, the respiratory intervention training was given on this basis in the intervention group, once a day for two weeks. The intervention effect was evaluated by the time of indwelling gastric tube, hospital stay, feeding reaction, feeding related complications and satisfaction rate of catch-up growth. The oral feeding ability of preterm infants was evaluated by the non-nutritive sucking (NNS) score and preterm infants oral feeding readiness assessment scale (PIOFRAS) score.Results:The time of indwelling gastric tube and hospital stay was (15.3 ± 8.7), (28.9 ± 9.8) d in the intervention group and (21.7 ± 9.8), (34.6 ± 12.2) d in the control group, the difference was significant ( t=3.12, 2.32, both P<0.05). After intervention, the differences of respiratory number, heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation were (6.5 ± 1.3) beats/min, (11.2 ± 1.5) beats/min, 0.048 ± 0.015 in the intervention group and (11.2 ± 1.2) beats/min, (16.5 ± 1.3) beats/min, 0.082 ± 0.018 in the control group, the differences were significant ( t=16.39, 16.40, 9.35, all P<0.05). The incidence of feeding-related complications was 25.0% (10/40) in the intervention group and 55.0% (22/40) in the control group, the difference was significant ( χ2=7.50, P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of catch-up growth was 77.5%(31/40) in the intervention group and 40.0%(16/40) in the control group, the difference was significant ( χ2=12.78, P<0.05). The scores of NNS and PIOFRAS at 7 d, 10 d and 14 d after intervention were (13.73 ± 2.24), (29.98 ± 6.67), (49.08 ± 16.37) points and (15.28 ± 1.41), (25.08 ± 3.10), (31.03 ± 3.00) points in the intervention group and (10.30 ± 2.18), (15.68 ± 2.42), (28.60 ± 3.61) points and (12.60 ± 1.22), (17.15 ± 1.51), (23.75 ± 3.87) points in the control group, the differences were significant ( t values were -14.53--6.94, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The respiratory intervention training can effectively shorten the transition time from tube feeding to complete oral feeding in preterm infants, reduce feeding reaction and the incidence of feeding-related complications, and promote the coordination of feeding behavior, so as to improve oral feeding ability and catch-up growth of preterm infants.
