Comparative analysis of domestic Octoparms and imported Celect inferior vena cava filter in interventional treatment of venous thromboembolism
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2024.03.026
- VernacularTitle:国产Octoparms与进口Celect下腔静脉滤器在静脉血栓栓塞症介入治疗中的对比分析
- Author:
Jinchang XIAO
1
;
Qianxin HUANG
;
Jing YANG
;
Mingming JIANG
;
Ning WEI
;
Hongtao LIU
;
Yanfeng CUI
;
Yuming GU
;
Maoheng ZU
;
Hao XU
;
Qingqiao ZHANG
Author Information
1. 徐州医科大学附属医院介入放射科,江苏 徐州 221006
- Keywords:
venous thromboembolism;
inferior vena cava filter;
interventional treatment
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2024;40(3):456-459,463
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare and analyze the application value of domestic Octoparms and imported Celect inferior vena cava filter(IVCF)in the interventional treatment of venous thromboembolism(VTE).Methods Forty patients with VTE were randomly divided into Octoparms group(experimental group)and Celect group(control group)according to the double-blinded method of the central random system.All the patients underwent filter placement,catheter-directed thrombolysis and filter retrieval.The primary end point was the success of filter placement and retrieval,and the secondary end point included indwelling complications such as the occurrence of pulmonary embolism(PE)and filter tilt and migration.Results Forty patients were enrolled in this study,22 patients and 18 patients were divided into the experimental group and the control group,respectively.Among them,11 cases were identified with right lower extremity deep vein thrombosis,29 cases with left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis,17 cases with PE,and 6 cases with inferior vena cava thrombosis.The success rate of IVCF placement was 100%in all participants.Immediately after filter place-ment,the angle of filter tilt was(3.8±2.3)° in the experimental group and(4.9±2.8)° in the control group(t=1.44,P=0.16).Filter retrieval was successful in 21 cases(21/22,95.5%)of the experimental group and 17 cases(17/18,95.5%)of the control group.There was no significant difference between the two groups(t=0.14,P=0.89).The mean indwelling time of filter was(8.0±2.1)days in the experimental group and(9.7±3.1)days in the control group(t=0.73,P=0.47).The angle of filter tilt was(5.3±3.4)° in the experimental group and(5.7±7.7)° in the control group(t=0.19,P=0.85).There was no significant difference for filter placement and retrieval between the two groups(t=0.48 and 2.00,P=0.06 and 0.64,respectively).There were no complications of filter migration,strut penetration or new PE in both groups.Conclusion The application value of domestic Octoparms and impor-ted Celect IVCF is similar in interventional treatment of VTE.
