Comparative analysis of clinical and radiographic characteristics of severe influenza A H1N1 and H3N2
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2024.03.024
- VernacularTitle:重型甲型H1N1与H3N2流感临床及影像特征比较分析
- Author:
Shumin XU
1
;
Weiting TAN
;
Xiaoyu WANG
;
Peng LI
;
Qimeng FAN
;
Hongwu ZENG
Author Information
1. 深圳市儿童医院放射科,广东 深圳 518038
- Keywords:
severe influenza A;
H1N1;
H3N2;
computed tomography;
magnetic resonance imaging
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2024;40(3):447-451
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the differences in clinical and radiographic features between severe influenza A H1N1 and H3N2 in children.Methods The clinical and radiographic data of children diagnosed with severe influenza A H1N1 and H3N2 were analyzed retrospectively.According to the pathogen subtypes,they were divided into H1N1 group(34 cases)and H3N2 group(23 cases).Differences in clinical data,laboratory results,treatment,hospitalization time,outcome,and radiographic features between the two groups were analyzed.The t-test was used for the comparison of normally distributed measurement data between the groups,and Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of non-normally distributed measurement data between the groups.Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability method was used for the analysis of counting data,depending on the situation.Results There were differences in the season of onset,clinical and radiographic features between the two groups.H1N1 subtype mostly occurred in win-ter,and mainly manifested as respiratory symptoms(wheezing/shortness of breath)and respiratory complications(severe pneumonia).H3N2 subtype was mainly observed in summer,and more likely to involve the central nervous system(CNS),presenting with neuro-logical symptoms(convulsions),abnormal electroencephalogram,and concurrent influenza associated encephalopathy(IAE).Conclusion There are significant differences in epidemiology,clinical and radiographic features between severe influenza A H1N1 and H3N2.H3N2 has a higher probability of concurrent IAE and should be highly vigilant in clinical practice.
