Evaluation for optimization effects of sperm floating plate
10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2023.10.04
- VernacularTitle:精子浮游板优选效果的评估
- Author:
Jie YANG
1
;
Ruyue LIU
;
Qi WANG
;
Shengjia SHI
;
Zhou ZHANG
Author Information
1. 西北妇女儿童医院生殖医学中心,西安 710000
- Keywords:
sperm floating plate;
density gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up;
sperm preparation;
sperm DNA fragmenta-tion index
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
2023;41(10):731-735
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the difference between sperm floating plate and density gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up in human sperm preparation.Methods The semen samples were obtained from 50 infertile men in the clinic of Reproductive Medi-cine of Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital excluding azoospermia,severe oligoasthenozoospermia and semen volume less than 2 mL.After semen liquefaction,the differences of sperm concentration,total progressively motile sperm count(TMSC),percentages of progressively motile sperm and normal morphology sperm,recovery rate and DNA fragmentation index(DFI)were measured by both the methods of sperm floating plate and density gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up,and the results were compared.Results Compared with the pre-sorting samples,sperm concentrations[(16.08±13.39)x 106/mL,(8.88±8.06)x 106/mL vs(60.05± 27.21)×106/mL],TMSC[(7.41±6.14)×106,(3.98±3.57)×106vs(22.24±13.74)×106]and DFI[(2.20±3.44)％,(5.20± 10.79)％vs(26.38±13.92)％]in the sorting groups by sperm floating plate and density gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up were decreased significantly,and the percentages of progressive motile sperm[(91.67±4.75)％,(87.86±7.90)％vs(40.21± 16.83)％]and normal morphology sperm[(9.58±5.08)％,(7.72±4.01)％vs(3.58±2.06)％]were increased significantly.Com-pared with the density gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up,the results of sperm floating plate were higher in sperm concen-tration,percentages of progressively motile sperm and normal morphology sperm,TMSC and sperm recovery rate[(30.74±13.70)％vs(17.09±9.20)％],but DFI was lower,time-consuming was shorter[(32.38±1.01)min vs(60.08±2.06)min],and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion The sperm floating plate may have certain clinical applica-tion prospects in the future due to better parameters of sperm preparation than those of density gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up in simple operation and shorter time-consuming.
