Clinical application of modified grading system for GSRS scores in assessing long-term postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in colon cancer patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20230928-00077
- VernacularTitle:GSRS评分改良分级系统在评估结肠癌患者发生术后长期胃肠功能紊乱中的临床应用
- Author:
Xiaozhe GU
1
;
Xiaobao YANG
;
Shen LING
;
Zhenghang JIN
;
Shun CAO
;
Jun LI
;
Guocong WU
;
Zhongtao ZHANG
;
Yun YANG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普通外科分中心 国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心，北京 100050
- Keywords:
Colonic neoplasms;
Postoperative complications;
Dyspepsia;
Digestive symptoms;
Modified grading system for GSRS
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2023;50(11):756-761
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the practical application and clinical significance of modified grading system for Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) scores in evaluating long-term postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGID) in patients after colon cancer surgery.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the case data of 122 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from September 2021 to September 2022. Among these patients, 69 were males (56.6%), and 53 were females (43.4%). The median age was 66.5 years, and the body mass index was (24.4±3.3) kg/m 2. The main observe indiator was GSRS scores of patients. The measurement data of normal distribution were represented as mean±standard deviation( ± s), and intergroup comparisons were conducted using ANOVA. The measurement data of non-normal distribution were expressed as the median (interquartile distance) [ M( Q1, Q3)], the Kruskal-Wallis H test was employed. Unordered count data comparisons were performed using the χ2 test, while comparisons for ordered count data between groups were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. GSRS scores were represented using density plots, and the scores were categorized into five symptom groups, presented using radar charts to illustrate the distribution of each symptom group. Results:Among the 122 patients, the most common long-term PGID syndromes was dyspepsia, followed by abdominal pain, diarrhea, and constipation. GSRS score data in the study population exhibited a nearly trimodal trend. Based on the overall data trend, the GSRS scale was refined, with cut-off values of 20 and 30, categorizing patients with right-sided colon cancer into low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups for quantifying the severity of long-term PGID. In terms of gender distribution, the differences among the three groups was statistically significant ( P=0.031), suggesting that males may be more susceptible to long-term PGID. However, there were no significant differences among the three groups concerning age, tumor location, surgical approach, anastomotic technique, lymph node dissection, pathological staging, adjuvant chemotherapy, and other factors. Conclusions:The modified grading system for GSRS scores aligns with the distribution characteristics of postoperative gastrointestinal function in colorectal cancer patients. It can quantify the risk of long-term PGID, allowing for a graded management approach to improve the postoperative quality of life for patients.
