Efficacy of Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder Combined With Linaclotide in Bowel Preparation: A Clinical Randomized Controlled Study
10.3969/j.issn.1008-7125.2022.05.005
- Author:
Jiaqi CHENG
1
;
Yun YOU
2
;
Zhanguo NIE
2
;
Dan LI
3
Author Information
1. Xinjiang Medical University
2. Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Region
3. Shihezi University School of Medicine, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bowel Preparation;
Colonoscopy;
Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder;
Linaclotide;
Randomized Controlled Trial
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology
2023;27(5):284-288
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Background: The traditional bowel preparation compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG) has poor tolerance in some patients due to the need for a large amount of water, which has a limited cleaning effect and affects the visual field of observation. Therefore, it is of clinical significance to find a bowel cleaning method with strong cleaning power, high safety and is acceptable to most of the patients. Aims: To explore the efficacy and safety of PEG combined with linaclotide in bowel preparation. Methods: A total of 414 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: control group (3 L PEG group), observation group A (3 L PEG+290 μg linaclotide), observation group B (2 L PEG+290 μg linaclotide). The primary outcome was the efficacy of bowel preparation based on the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), the secondary outcomes were withdrawal time, time interval from preparation to colonoscopy, incidence of complications, cecal insertion rate, detection rates of polyps, adenoma, hemorrhoid and other diseases. BBPS score in constipation subgroup was analyzed. Results: The appropriate bowel preparation rate, BBPS score, and detection rates of polyps and hemorrhoid in observation group A were significantly higher than those in control group and observation group B (P<0.05), and no significant differences in above⁃mentioned indices were found between observation group B and control group (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in cecal insertion rate, incomplete colonoscopy rate, detection rates of adenoma and other diseases, withdrawal time, time interval from preparation to colonoscopy, and incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P>0.05). BBPS score in constipation patients in observation group A was significantly higher than that in observation group B and control group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Linaclotide is safe and effective as an adjuvant for bowel preparation. 3 L PEG combined with linaclotide can improve the quality of bowel cleaning.
