Determinants for further wishes for cosmetic and reconstructive interventions in 1652 patients with surgical treated carcinomas of the oral cavity.
10.1186/s40902-017-0125-1
- Author:
Henrik HOLTMANN
1
;
Simon SPALTHOFF
;
Nils Claudius GELLRICH
;
Jörg HANDSCHEL
;
Julian LOMMEN
;
Norbert R KÜBLER
;
Gertrud KRÜSKEMPER
;
Majeed RANA
;
Karoline SANDER
Author Information
1. Department for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstr 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. Henrik.Holtmann@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cosmetic surgery;
Scarring;
Quality of life;
Depression;
Coping;
Oral cancer
- MeSH:
Appointments and Schedules;
Cicatrix;
Cross-Sectional Studies;
Depression;
Diagnosis;
Facial Muscles;
Humans;
Informed Consent;
Methods;
Mouth Neoplasms;
Mouth*;
Quality of Life;
Rehabilitation;
Retrospective Studies;
Return to Work;
Social Environment;
Surgeons;
Surgery, Oral;
Surgery, Plastic
- From:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
2017;39(9):26-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The impairment of the appearance is a major problem for patients with carcinomas of the oral cavity. These patients want to recover their preoperative facial appearance. Some do not realize that this is not always possible and hence develop a desire for further cosmetic and reconstructive surgery (CRS) which often causes psychological problems. METHOD: The desire of patients for CRS (N = 410; 26%) has been acquired in this DÖSAK rehab study including multiple reasons such as medical, functional, aesthetic and psychosocial aspects. They relate to the parameters of diagnosis, treatment and postoperative rehabilitation. Patients without the wish for CRS (N = 1155; 74%) served as control group. For the surgeons, knowledge of the patient’s views is relevant in the wish for CRS. Nevertheless, it has hardly been investigated for patients postoperatively to complete resection of oral cancer. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, questionnaires with 147 variables were completed during control appointments. Thirty-eight departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery took part, and 1652 German patients at least 6 months after complete cancer resection answered the questions. Additionally, a physician’s questionnaire (N = 1489) was available. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS vers. 22. RESULTS: The patient’s assessment of their appearance and scarring are the most important criteria resulting in wishes for CRS. Furthermore, functional limitations such as eating/swallowing, pain of the facial muscles, numb regions in the operating field, dealing with the social environment, return to work, tumour size and location, removal and reconstruction are closely related. CONCLUSION: The wish for CRS depends on diverse functional psychosocial and psychological parameters. Hence, it has to be issued during conversation to improve rehabilitation. A decision on the medical treatment can be of greater satisfaction if the surgeon knows the patients’ needs and is able to compare them with the medical capabilities. The informed consent between doctor and patient in regard to these findings is necessary.
