Analysis and optimization of the record management practice in occupational health examination institutions
10.20001/j.issn.2095-2619.20231019
- VernacularTitle:职业健康检查机构备案管理实践探析与优化
- Author:
Ruiyan HUANG
1
;
Huiru PENG
;
Xiaoyi LI
;
Jiabin CHEN
;
Shijie HU
Author Information
1. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangdong Quality Control Center for Occupational Health Examination, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510300, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Occupational health examination;
Record management;
Administrative license;
Supervision and administration;
Release, control and service
- From:
China Occupational Medicine
2023;50(5):585-590
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases Law revised in 2017 abolished the qualification test and approval for occupational health examination institutions, and replaced it with record management. The record does not belong to any type of administrative permit and does not require the premise of “general prohibition”. Its core idea is that “the public law actively acts as an obligation”, which does not prohibit administrative counterpart from carrying out specific tasks, mainly information collection, supervision and management of follow-ups, and emphasizes on simplifying procedures, improving working efficiency and stimulating market vitality. It is a strategic measure of the government's reform on “release, control and service”. It has the functional significance of alleviating information asymmetry, cultivating market credit mechanism and reflecting the government's flexible supervision and management mechanisms. However, China has not yet unified legislation on record management, and individuals on the theoretical and practical circles have different understandings on the concept, operation principle, and management effectiveness of the record management. There are practical dilemmas in the record management of occupational health examination institutions, such as alienation of record management into licensing, insufficient regulation of record management procedures, and weak in-process and post-process supervision and management capabilities. It is suggested to clarify the legal nature of record management, unify and improve the record management procedures, and improve in-process and post-process supervision and management capabilities. By building a legal, scientific and systematic regulation for the record management of occupational health examination institutions, adhering to the unity of “discharge” and “control”, it could effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of occupational health examination institutions, workers and employers.
