Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Analysis of Endometrial Pattern and Thickness Changes in Normal Menstrual Cycle.
- Author:
Chang Suk SUH
;
Seok Hyun KIM
;
Young Min CHOI
;
Jung Gu KIM
;
Shin Yong MOON
;
Jin Yong LEE
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Acoustics;
Biopsy;
Endometrium;
Female;
Humans;
Incidence;
Infertility;
Menstrual Cycle*;
Retrospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Seoul
- From:Korean Journal of Fertility and Sterility
1998;25(2):153-160
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the transvaginal ultrasonographic analysis of endometrial pattern and thickness could predict the stage of menstrual cycle. Endometrial pattern and thickness were observed in those patients receiving infertility work up from April, 1 f94 to July, 1998 at Seoul National University Hospital. The study group was 185 patients with normal regular menstrual cycles. Among them, 44 patients received endometrial biopsy, and the date of endometrium was compared with the observed endometrial pattern and thickness. The observed endometrial pattern was presence or absence of central cavity echogenicity, triple line sign, endometrial hypoechogenicity, ring sign, endometrial hyperechogenicity and posterior acoustic sonic enhancement. The results were as follows; Central cavity echogenicity was seen throughout menstrual cycle. Triple line sign was observed in 81.1% of patients during early secretory phase. However, in mid to late secretory phase, triple line sign was appeared in only 6.8%. The percentage of positive endometrial hypoechogenicity was highest in early secretory phase. In contrast to hypoechogenicity, positive endometrial hyperechogenicty was highest in mid to late secretory phase. Ring sign was observed in 73.5% of the patients during early secretory phase with peak incidence. Posterior acoustic enhancement was seen in 72.7% of the patients during late secretory phase The sensitivity and specificity of being a secretory phase if the patients showed hyperechogenic endometrium, were 84.2%, 83.3% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of being a secretory phase if the patients showed posterior acoustic enhancement were 93.8%, 58.3% respectively. Endometrial thickness was not correlated with endometrial dating. In conclusion, transvaginal ultrasonographical delineation of the endometrial pattern might to useful tool in predicting endometrial status during normal menstrual cycle. But, endometrial thickness could not predict the endometrial dating.
