Study on the Cognitive Attitude of Doctors and Patients towards the Rank of Rights and Interests and Its Related Factors
10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2022.03.14
- VernacularTitle:医患双方对权利位阶的认知态度及其相关因素研究
- Author:
Zhenchao YANG
1
;
Hanchun XIE
2
;
Junrong LIU
3
Author Information
1. School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511400, China
2. Human Resources Department, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan 528200, China
3. School of Marxism, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511400, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Doctor and Patient;
Medical Decision-making;
Rank of Rights and Interests;
Cognitive Attitude
- From:
Chinese Medical Ethics
2024;35(3):315-321
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
In order to further understand the cognitive attitude of different groups towards the rank of rights and interests in medical decision-making and its influencing factors, and provide theoretical reference for the practice of medical decision-making, this study conducted convenience sampling through the questionnaire star enterprise edition. The collected data were descriptive statistical analysis with SPSS 21.0 software and joint hypothesis testing. The results showed that there were differences in the cognition of religious beliefs on the same individual’s rights and interests rank among the sample population (P<0.05). There were differences in the cognition of professional title, working years and institution level on the attitude of rights and interests rank in the group of medical institutions (P<0.05). In the ranking of the importance of individual rights usually involved in medical activities, the rights to life, health and equality were the most important. Most people can rationally view the rights and interests of doctors, patients and stakeholders. In medical decision-making, we should adhere to the principle of right rank, give priority to safeguarding the right to life and give consideration to fairness and justice. In the face of conflicts of interest, we should do a good job in value evaluation, safeguard the reasonable interests of patients and give consideration to the demands of family members.
