Analysis of the Current Situation of Medical Researchers’ Cognition and Attitude towards Ethical Review in China
10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2022.01.06
- VernacularTitle:我国医学科研人员对伦理审查的认知和态度分析
- Author:
Shanshan LI
1
;
Xinqing ZHANG
2
;
Hui JIANG
3
;
Naisheng CHANG
1
Author Information
1. College of Marxism, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an 710021, China
2. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
3. Department of Science and Education, Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Medical Researchers;
Ethical Review;
Biomedical Research Involving Human Subject;
Ethics Committee
- From:
Chinese Medical Ethics
2024;35(1):33-40
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Based on the data of a national sampling survey, this paper described and analyzed the understanding, attitude, behavior, and their differences and influencing factors of Chinese medical researchers on ethical review of biomedical research involving human subject. The survey found that researchers with master’s degree or below, working in scientific research institutes or universities, no overseas experience, living in the central region and not serving as committee members have relatively poor acquaintance of "ethical review" ; researchers with the characteristics of male, the younger age, living in the western region, knowing less about "ethical review" , agree more with the view that "ethical review consumes too much time and energy" ; researchers who serve as members of the ethics committee are more likely to participate in scientific research projects that have not passed the ethical review process. Therefore, recommendations are put forward: comprehensively popularizing the training of ethical review, focusing on strengthening the vulnerable groups and regions, strictly implementing ethical review laws and regulations, and strengthening evaluation and supervision, so as to improve the service quality and efficiency of ethical review in multiple directions.