Rudimentary horn pregnancy: clinical analysis of 12 cases and literature review.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231112-00184
- Author:
Ming Mei LIN
1
;
Yi Meng GE
1
;
Shuo YANG
1
;
Rui YANG
1
;
Rong LI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Pregnancy;
Humans;
Female;
Young Adult;
Adult;
Cesarean Section/adverse effects*;
Retrospective Studies;
Pregnancy, Ectopic/surgery*;
Pregnancy, Cornual/surgery*;
Uterus/surgery*;
Uterine Rupture/etiology*;
Abortion, Spontaneous
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2024;59(1):49-55
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatments and fertility recovery of rudimentary horn pregnancy (RHP). Methods: The clinical data of 12 cases with RHP diagnosed and treated in Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical informations, diagnosis and treatments of RHP and the pregnancy status after surgery were analyzed. Results: The median age of 12 RHP patients was 29 years (range: 24-37 years). Eight cases of pregnancy in residual horn of uterus occurred in type Ⅰ residual horn of uterus, 4 cases occurred in type Ⅱ residual horn of uterus; among which 5 cases were misdiagnosed by ultrasound before surgery. All patients underwent excision of residual horn of uterus and affected salpingectomy. After surgery, 9 patients expected future pregnancy, and 3 cases of natural pregnancy, 2 cases of successful pregnancy through assisted reproductive technology. Four pregnancies resulted in live birth with cesarean section, and 1 case resulted in spontaneous abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. No uterine rupture or ectopic pregnancy occurred in subsequent pregnancies. Conclusions: Ultrasonography could aid early diagnosis of RHP while misdiagnosis occurred in certain cases. Thus, a comprehensive judgment and decision ought to be made based on medical history, physical examination and assisted examination. Surgical exploration is necessary for diagnosis and treatment of RHP. For infertile patients, assisted reproductive technology should be applied when necessary. Caution to prevent the occurrence of pregnancy complications such as uterine rupture, and application of cesarean section to terminate pregnancy are recommended.
