To compare the efficacy and incidence of severe hematological adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
- Author:
Xiao Shuai ZHANG
1
;
Bing Cheng LIU
2
;
Xin DU
3
;
Yan Li ZHANG
4
;
Na XU
5
;
Xiao Li LIU
5
;
Wei Ming LI
6
;
Hai LIN
7
;
Rong LIANG
8
;
Chun Yan CHEN
9
;
Jian HUANG
10
;
Yun Fan YANG
11
;
Huan Ling ZHU
11
;
Ling PAN
11
;
Xiao Dong WANG
12
;
Gui Hui LI
13
;
Zhuo Gang LIU
14
;
Yan Qing ZHANG
15
;
Zhen Fang LIU
16
;
Jian Da HU
17
;
Chun Shui LIU
7
;
Fei LI
18
;
Wei YANG
14
;
Li MENG
19
;
Yan Qiu HAN
20
;
Li E LIN
21
;
Zhen Yu ZHAO
21
;
Chuan Qing TU
22
;
Cai Feng ZHENG
22
;
Yan Liang BAI
23
;
Ze Ping ZHOU
24
;
Su Ning CHEN
25
;
Hui Ying QIU
25
;
Li Jie YANG
26
;
Xiu Li SUN
27
;
Hui SUN
28
;
Li ZHOU
29
;
Ze Lin LIU
30
;
Dan Yu WANG
30
;
Jian Xin GUO
31
;
Li Ping PANG
32
;
Qing Shu ZENG
33
;
Xiao Hui SUO
34
;
Wei Hua ZHANG
35
;
Yuan Jun ZHENG
35
;
Qian JIANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Efficacy; Flumatinib; Imatinib; Leukemia, myeloid, chronic (CML); Severe hematologic adverse events
- MeSH: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects*; Incidence; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects*; Retrospective Studies; Pyrimidines/adverse effects*; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy*; Treatment Outcome; Benzamides/adverse effects*; Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/drug therapy*; Aminopyridines/therapeutic use*; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use*
- From: Chinese Journal of Hematology 2023;44(9):728-736
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: Objective: To analyze and compare therapy responses, outcomes, and incidence of severe hematologic adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: Data of patients with chronic phase CML diagnosed between January 2006 and November 2022 from 76 centers, aged ≥18 years, and received initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy within 6 months after diagnosis in China were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the bias of the initial TKI selection, and the therapy responses and outcomes of patients receiving initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy were compared. Results: A total of 4 833 adult patients with CML receiving initial imatinib (n=4 380) or flumatinib (n=453) therapy were included in the study. In the imatinib cohort, the median follow-up time was 54 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-85] months, and the 7-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.2%, 88.4%, 78.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. The 7-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 71.8%, 93.0%, and 96.9%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 13-25) months in the flumatinib cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.4%, 86.5%, 58.4%, and 46.6%, respectively. The 2-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 80.1%, 95.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. The PSM analysis indicated that patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) and higher probabilities of FFS than those receiving the initial imatinib therapy (all P<0.001), whereas the PFS (P=0.230) and OS (P=0.268) were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe hematologic adverse events (grade≥Ⅲ) was comparable in the two cohorts. Conclusion: Patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had higher cumulative incidences of therapy responses and higher probability of FFS than those receiving initial imatinib therapy, whereas the incidence of severe hematologic adverse events was comparable between the two cohorts.