Adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate among gastroenterology fellows and consultants in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines: A cross-sectional study
https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.8395
- Author:
Jonathan J. Macatiag, IV
1
;
Bernadette Alexis M. Mariño
1
;
A. Nico Nahar I. Pajes
2
;
Eric B. Yasay
2
Author Information
1. Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila
2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Adenoma detection rate
- MeSH:
Adenoma;
Colonic Polyps;
Colorectal Neoplasms;
Colonoscopy
- From:
Acta Medica Philippina
2024;58(Early Access 2024):1-12
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background and Objective:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Likewise in the Philippines, the prevalence of CRC has shown to be increasing. Colonoscopy, a screening procedure for CRC, has parameters to gauge quality of detection. One of which is the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR). Higher ADR has been linked to improved cancer detection. This study aimed to determine the ADR and Polyp Detection Rate (PDR) among Gastroenterology practitioners in a tertiary government university hospital in the Philippines, estimate ADR from PDR, and identify factors associated with ADR.
Methods:An analytical, cross-sectional study among patients who underwent colonoscopy for the years 2021 and the first half of 2022 at the Central Endoscopy Unit (CENDU) of the Philippine General Hospital. Demographic data of fellows and consultants were collected through an online form, while those from patients were obtained from electronic records. Colonoscopy details and histopathology results were accessed through the hospital’s Open Medical Record System (MRS). ADR, PDR, and estimated ADR were computed using established formulas. To evaluate the strength of the relationship between the estimated and actual ADR, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. Chi-square analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were performed to identify the factors that might influence the ADR. A cut-off of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:The total computed ADR of consultants and fellows combined is 22%. The difference between the ADRs of Gastroenterology consultants and Fellows-in-Training is statistically significant at 31.6% and 18.7%, respectively (p= 0.017). The total Polyp Detection Rate is 57.6% while the weighted group average Adenoma to Polyp Detection Rate Quotient (APDRQ) is 0.4085 or 40.85%. The estimated ADR has a moderate degree of correlation with the actual ADR when an outlier was excluded (r=0.521 (95% CI, 0.072-0.795, p=0.0266). Significant factors related to ADR include endoscopists’ years of practice (p=0.020), number of colonoscopies done (p=0.031), and patient tobacco use (p=0.014).
Conclusion:The overall ADR among consultants and fellows is at par with the standard guidelines. A moderate degree of correlation exists between actual and estimated ADR when an outlier is excluded; however, more studies are needed to determine the APDRQ in the wider local setting. Longer years in practice, total number of colonoscopies performed, and patient tobacco use are associated with increased ADR.
- Full text:8395-Other-146731-1-10-20240222.pdf
