Study of dental arch width in patients with idiopathic condylar resorption.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.08.010
- Author:
Xiaobo CHEN
1
;
Ping CHEN
1
;
Shanwei MA
1
;
Yuanwei LIANG
2
;
Lin XU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics,Zhuhai Dental Hospital,Zhuhai,519000,China.
2. Department of Stomatology,Fifth People's Hospital.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
alveolar bone width;
arch width;
idiopathic condylar resorption
- MeSH:
Humans;
Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging*;
Dental Arch;
Bone Resorption;
Mandible;
Malocclusion
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;37(8):652-655
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the relationship between idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) and arch width disorder. Methods:Thirty-two patients with ICR and twenty patients without condylar resorption were enrolled according to the same inclusion criteria. They were divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group was divided into unilateral ICR group and bilateral ICR group according to the affected side of condylar resorption, and then experimental group was divided into subgroups ICR Ⅰ, ICRⅡand ICR Ⅲ according to the degree of condylar resorption. Patients with no condylar resorption were used as a control group. The width of anterior, middle and posterior segments of dental arch on cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) was measured and the two groups of measured values were statistically analyzed. Results:Compared with the control group, the width of maxillary anterior, middle and posterior segments in ICR group was significantly reduced, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01). But the width of mandibular segment was not significantly different from that in control group(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the width of anterior, middle and posterior dental arch between subgroups(P>0.05). Conclusion:Almost all patients with ICR have malocclusion of maxillary and mandibular arch width, but there is no significant correlation between the malocclusion width and the severity of condylar resorption.