Risk of anticoagulation therapy in surgical intensive care unit patients predicted by thromboelastograph.
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.07.008
- Author:
Zixia WU
1
;
Zhiyong LIU
;
Wei ZHANG
;
Wenzheng ZHANG
;
En MU
Author Information
1. Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, Tianjin, China. Corresponding author: Mu En, Email: muen1010@163.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Anticoagulants;
Critical Care;
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight;
Humans;
Pulmonary Embolism;
Risk Factors;
Thrombelastography;
Venous Thromboembolism
- From:
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2018;30(7):658-661
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the correlation between thromboelastography (TEG) parameters and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy in surgical intensive care unit (SICU).
METHODS:205 patients received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) anticoagulant therapy admitted to SICU of Tianjin Hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were consecutively enrolled. TEG detection was performed in all patients at 1 day after anticoagulation therapy, and coagulation reaction time (R value), blood clot generation time (K value), blood clot generation rate (α angle) and maximum width value (MA value) were recorded. At the same time, the traditional coagulation function test was carried out, and prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and D-dimer levels were also recorded. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and bleeding during hospitalization were observed. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for VTE and bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy.
RESULTS:Of 205 patients, during the anticoagulant treatment, 14 patients developed DVT, and 4 patients with PE (2 of them were combined with DVT) with an incidence of 7.8% (16/205). There were 2 patients suffering from cerebral hemorrhage, 2 patients with gastric bleeding, and 1 patient with intra-tracheal hemorrhage with an incidence of 2.4% (5/205). Compared with the patients without VTE or bleeding, the R value of TEG in patients with VTE was significantly lowered (minutes: 4.6±2.2 vs. 7.4±1.4, P < 0.01), which was significantly increased in patients with hemorrhagic complications (minutes: 12.1±1.1 vs. 7.4±1.4, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the K value, α angle, MA value of TEG, or PT, APTT, D-dimer between the patients with and without VTE or bleeding. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that the R value of TEG was independent risk factor for incidence of VTE and hemorrhagic complication in SICU patients who receiving anticoagulation therapy [VTE: β = 0.386, odds ratio (OR) = 1.096, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.021-2.361, P = 0.006; hemorrhagic complication: β = -1.213, OR = 1.051, 95%CI = 1.017-3.458, P = 0.045].
CONCLUSIONS:The R value of TEG is associated with the occurrence of VTE and hemorrhagic complications in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy in SICU.
