Clinical application of cross microsurgical vasovasostomy in scrotum for atypical obstructive azoospermia.
- Author:
Zhong-Yan LIANG
1
;
Feng-Bin ZHANG
1
;
Le-Jun LI
1
;
Jing-Ping LI
1
;
Jing-Gen WU
1
;
Chong CHEN
2
;
Yi-Min ZHU
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Vasovasostomy; Azoospermia; Microsurgery
- MeSH: Adult; Anastomosis, Surgical; Azoospermia/surgery*; Epididymis/pathology*; Female; Humans; Infertility/surgery*; Male; Oligospermia/surgery*; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies; Scrotum/surgery*; Treatment Outcome; Vas Deferens; Vasovasostomy/methods*; Young Adult
- From: Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2019;20(3):282-286
- CountryChina
- Language:English
- Abstract: Seminal duct obstruction may result in obstructive azoospermia (OA) and severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) (<0.5 million/mL) (Nordhoff et al., 2015). Cases of partial OA and OAT can be treated effectively by microsurgical anastomosis (Goldstein and Kim, 2013) to obtain successful surgical reversal. However, microsurgical vasovasostomy (VV) (Dickey et al., 2015) and vasoepididymostomy (VE) (Peng et al., 2017) are not suitable for patients with atypical OA and poor epididymis conditions or unpredictable obstruction of the distal vas deferens. For those patients, cross anastomosis may be applied instead of routine VE or VV. A single-center, retrospective, comparison study was conducted, which assessed the usefulness of the cross VV (CVV) in the scrotum for indication and efficacy. A total of 77 cases with OA or OAT were included, and 20 cases implemented cross anastomosis, including unilateral CVV (UCVV) in 4 cases, unilateral VE plus CVV (UVE+CVV) in 11 cases, and unilateral VV-based CVV (UVV+CVV) in 5 cases. The other 57 cases received no cross-matching anastomosis. The patency and natural pregnancy rates in one year were 75.0% and 50.0%, respectively, in the UCVV group; 54.5% and 27.3%, respectively, in the UVE+CVV group; and 60.0% and 40.0%, respectively, in the UVV+CVV group. The CVV in the scrotum in the selected patients with OA and severe OAT could yield good results. We regard the CVV in the scrotum as an efficacious operation with a lower risk of injury in cases of atypical OA.
