A finite element analysis of the stress distribution to the mandible from impact forces with various orientations of third molars.
- Author:
Yun-Feng LIU
1
;
Russell WANG
2
;
Dale A BAUR
3
;
Xian-Feng JIANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Finite element analysis; Third molar; Mandible; Biomechanical simulation
- MeSH: Adult; Algorithms; Biomechanical Phenomena; Computer Simulation; Dental Stress Analysis; Elastic Modulus; Female; Finite Element Analysis; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Mandible/physiopathology*; Mandibular Fractures/physiopathology*; Models, Biological; Molar, Third/physiopathology*; Stress, Mechanical; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From: Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2018;19(1):38-48
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the stress distribution to the mandible, with and without impacted third molars (IM3s) at various orientations, resulting from a 2000-Newton impact force either from the anterior midline or from the body of the mandible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:A 3D mandibular virtual model from a healthy dentate patient was created and the mechanical properties of the mandible were categorized to 9 levels based on the Hounsfield unit measured from computed tomography (CT) images. Von Mises stress distributions to the mandibular angle and condylar areas from static impact forces (Load I-front blow and Load II left blow) were evaluated using finite element analysis (FEA). Six groups with IM3 were included: full horizontal bony, full vertical bony, full 450 mesioangular bony, partial horizontal bony, partial vertical, and partial 450 mesioangular bony impaction, and a baseline group with no third molars.
RESULTS:Von Mises stresses in the condyle and angle areas were higher for partially than for fully impacted third molars under both loading conditions, with partial horizontal IM3 showing the highest fracture risk. Stresses were higher on the contralateral than on the ipsilateral side. Under Load II, the angle area had the highest stress for various orientations of IM3s. The condylar region had the highest stress when IM3s were absent.
CONCLUSIONS:High-impact forces are more likely to cause condylar rather than angular fracture when IM3s are missing. The risk of mandibular fracture is higher for partially than fully impacted third molars, with the angulation of impaction having little effect on facture risk.
